241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32538478)
1. Reconciling multiple counterfactuals when evaluating biodiversity conservation impact in social-ecological systems.
Bull JW; Strange N; Smith RJ; Gordon A
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):510-521. PubMed ID: 32538478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Importance of methodological pluralism in deriving counterfactuals for evidence-based conservation.
Holden P; Anderson M; Eckardt F; Ziervogel G; Jack SL; New MG; Smit J; Visser M; Hoffman MT
Conserv Biol; 2024 Jun; 38(3):e14285. PubMed ID: 38686632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using a social-ecological framework to inform the implementation of conservation plans.
Guerrero AM; Wilson KA
Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 27601156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the conservation impact of Antarctica's protected areas.
Burrows JL; Lee JR; Wilson KA
Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14059. PubMed ID: 36661063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying biases in marine-protected-area placement relative to abatable threats.
Kuempel CD; Jones KR; Watson JEM; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 31131932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving credibility and transparency of conservation impact evaluations through the partial identification approach.
McConnachie MM; Romero C; Ferraro PJ; van Wilgen BW
Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):371-81. PubMed ID: 26289970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of baseline specification in evaluating conservation interventions and achieving no net loss of biodiversity.
Bull JW; Gordon A; Law EA; Suttle KB; Milner-Gulland EJ
Conserv Biol; 2014 Jun; 28(3):799-809. PubMed ID: 24945031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the impact of private land conservation with synthetic control design.
Sharma R; Jones S; Robinson D; Gordon A
Conserv Biol; 2023 Dec; 37(6):e14150. PubMed ID: 37461881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scenario analysis for biodiversity conservation: a social-ecological system approach in the Australian Alps.
Mitchell M; Lockwood M; Moore SA; Clement S
J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 150():69-80. PubMed ID: 25438114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the impact of biodiversity offsetting on native vegetation.
Zu Ermgassen SOSE; Devenish K; Simmons BA; Gordon A; Jones JPG; Maron M; Schulte To Bühne H; Sharma R; Sonter LJ; Strange N; Ward M; Bull JW
Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Aug; 29(15):4397-4411. PubMed ID: 37300408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel framework for analyzing conservation impacts: evaluation, theory, and marine protected areas.
Mascia MB; Fox HE; Glew L; Ahmadia GN; Agrawal A; Barnes M; Basurto X; Craigie I; Darling E; Geldmann J; Gill D; Holst Rice S; Jensen OP; Lester SE; McConney P; Mumby PJ; Nenadovic M; Parks JE; Pomeroy RS; White AT
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2017 Jul; 1399(1):93-115. PubMed ID: 28719737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization.
Gissi E; McGowan J; Venier C; Carlo DD; Musco F; Menegon S; Mackelworth P; Agardy T; Possingham H
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 29767466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
Habib TJ; Farr DR; Schneider RR; Boutin S
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in the added conservation value of land protection when prioritizing protected areas.
Yoon HS; Vijay V; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 35661264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of payments for environmental services and protected areas on local livelihoods and forest conservation in northern Cambodia.
Clements T; Milner-Gulland EJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 25492724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating approaches for scaling-up community-based marine-protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks.
Kockel A; Ban NC; Costa M; Dearden P
Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31206826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reference state and benchmark concepts for better biodiversity conservation in contemporary ecosystems.
McNellie MJ; Oliver I; Dorrough J; Ferrier S; Newell G; Gibbons P
Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Dec; 26(12):6702-6714. PubMed ID: 33090598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Offsetting the impacts of mining to achieve no net loss of native vegetation.
Sonter LJ; Barrett DJ; Soares-Filho BS
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):1068-76. PubMed ID: 24673499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How economic contexts shape calculations of yield in biodiversity offsetting.
Carver L; Sullivan S
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 28233932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using decision science to evaluate global biodiversity indices.
Watermeyer KE; Guillera-Arroita G; Bal P; Burgass MJ; Bland LM; Collen B; Hallam C; Kelly LT; McCarthy MA; Regan TJ; Stevenson S; Wintle BA; Nicholson E
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32557849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
