These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32539165)

  • 1. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology.
    McNulty R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36123631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP.
    Quintana DS; Williams DR
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):178. PubMed ID: 29879931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian inference of population prevalence.
    Ince RA; Paton AT; Kay JW; Schyns PG
    Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34612811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.
    García-Pérez MA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):142. PubMed ID: 32503439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical reporting deficiencies in environmental toxicology.
    Bosker T; Mudge JF; Munkittrick KR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1737-9. PubMed ID: 23553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In support of null hypothesis significance testing.
    Mogie M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S82-4. PubMed ID: 15101426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When significance becomes insignificant: Effect sizes and their uncertainties in Bayesian and frequentist frameworks as an alternative approach when analyzing ecotoxicological data.
    Feckler A; Low M; Zubrod JP; Bundschuh M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Jul; 37(7):1949-1955. PubMed ID: 29508923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Détente: A Practical Understanding of P values and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities.
    Ruberg SJ
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2021 Jun; 109(6):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 32748400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs.
    Balluerka Lasa N; Vergara Iraeta AI; Arnau Gras J
    Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 19178869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. fbst: An R package for the Full Bayesian Significance Test for testing a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e value.
    Kelter R
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1114-1130. PubMed ID: 34471963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studies.
    Hupé JM
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():18. PubMed ID: 25745383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment on ET&C perspectives, November 2015-A holistic view.
    Fox DR; Landis WG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1337-9. PubMed ID: 27216838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
    Stang A; Deckert M; Poole C; Rothman KJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 27858205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why we habitually engage in null-hypothesis significance testing: A qualitative study.
    Stunt J; van Grootel L; Bouter L; Trafimow D; Hoekstra T; de Boer M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258330. PubMed ID: 34653185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequentist, Bayesian Analysis and Complementary Statistical Tools for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Fields: Are Traditional Null-Hypothesis Significance Testing Methods Sufficient?
    Nascimento DDC; Rolnick N; da Silva Almeida I; Cipriano Junior G; Durigan JL
    Clin Interv Aging; 2024; 19():277-287. PubMed ID: 38380229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.