These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32539226)

  • 21. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers.
    Wright SJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22362500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does attendance at anatomy practical classes correlate with assessment outcome? A retrospective study of a large cohort of undergraduate anatomy students.
    Gonsalvez DG; Ovens M; Ivanusic J
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Dec; 15():231. PubMed ID: 26698839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a Novel Peer-sharing Application to Supplement Learning from Cadaveric Dissection.
    Dua A; Coppola KM; Mulheron GW; Troupe D; Lebeau R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Jul; 14(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 33135855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors influencing students' decisions to participate in a short "dissection experience" within a systemic anatomy course.
    Larkin TA; McAndrew DJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 23213067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Challenges and implementation of the German maternity protection act for female medical students in macroscopic anatomical education.
    Kulisch C; Langheinrich J; Heuckendorf E; Vida I; Brunk I
    GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(2):Doc17. PubMed ID: 32328519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utilizing Medical Students as Internal Assets to Enhance Gross Anatomy Laboratory Learning.
    Williams SE; Hawkins HG; Khalil MK
    Clin Anat; 2020 Mar; 33(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 31688953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Advance organizers in a gross anatomy dissection course and their effects on academic achievement.
    Chung EK; Nam KI; Oh SA; Han ER; Woo YJ; Hitchcock MA
    Clin Anat; 2013 Apr; 26(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 22576822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Design and implementation of an online systemic human anatomy course with laboratory.
    Attardi SM; Rogers KA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 24920278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploring the Utility and Student Perceptions of Synthetic Cadavers in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course.
    Richardson NS; Zwambag D; McFall K; Andrews DM; Gregory DE
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Sep; 14(5):605-614. PubMed ID: 33030276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why dissection videos should not replace cadaver prosections in the gross veterinary anatomy curriculum: results from a comparative study.
    Theoret CL; Carmel EN; Bernier S
    J Vet Med Educ; 2007; 34(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 17446641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students.
    Azer SA; Eizenberg N
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2007 Mar; 29(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 17318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relationship between the relative timing of prosection and dissection experiences and laboratory examination performance in a gross anatomy course.
    Martin JF; Linton A; Garrett AC; Mango DW; Svec PM; Magee C
    Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38954745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences Between Attached and Detached Cadaveric Prosections on Students' Identification Ability During Practical Examinations.
    Mattingly S; Hardesty E; Chovanec K; Cobos ME; Garcia J; Grizzle M; Huerta A; Ohtake J; Romero-Alvarez D; Gonzalez VH
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Nov; 14(6):808-815. PubMed ID: 33037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Student Perceived Value of Anatomy Pedagogy, Part I: Prosection or Dissection?
    Wisco JJ; Young S; Rabedeaux P; Lerner SD; Wimmers PF; Byus C; Guzman CR
    J Med Educ Curric Dev; 2015; 2():. PubMed ID: 35187248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visuospatial ability and student approach to learning as predictors of academic performance on written versus laboratory-based assessments in human anatomy.
    Wang C; McWatt SC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2023; 16(6):1187-1199. PubMed ID: 37483065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
    Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prosection or Dissection: Which is Best for Teaching the Anatomy of the Hand and Foot?
    Williams SR; Thompson KL; Notebaert AJ; Sinning AR
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 30118189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Value of Clinical Practice in Cadaveric Dissection: Lessons Learned From a Course in Eye and Orbital Anatomy.
    Schulz C
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 27771339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Head to head: The role of academic competition in undergraduate anatomical education.
    Van Nuland SE; Roach VA; Wilson TD; Belliveau DJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 25319077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.