These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32540383)

  • 1. Unknown confounders did not bias the treatment effect when improving balance of known confounders in randomized trials.
    Kuss O; Miller M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():9-16. PubMed ID: 32540383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatments effects from randomized trials and propensity score analyses were similar in similar populations in an example from cardiac surgery.
    Kuss O; Legler T; Börgermann J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1076-84. PubMed ID: 21482068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do the observational studies using propensity score analysis agree with randomized controlled trials in the area of sepsis?
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Crit Care; 2014 Oct; 29(5):886.e9-15. PubMed ID: 24996762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.
    Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 24774469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures.
    Lonjon G; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Ahmad N; Aim F; Nizard R; Ravaud P
    Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 24096758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes.
    Dahabreh IJ; Sheldrick RC; Paulus JK; Chung M; Varvarigou V; Jafri H; Rassen JA; Trikalinos TA; Kitsios GD
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(15):1893-901. PubMed ID: 22711757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emulation of Randomized Clinical Trials With Nonrandomized Database Analyses: Results of 32 Clinical Trials.
    Wang SV; Schneeweiss S; ; Franklin JM; Desai RJ; Feldman W; Garry EM; Glynn RJ; Lin KJ; Paik J; Patorno E; Suissa S; D'Andrea E; Jawaid D; Lee H; Pawar A; Sreedhara SK; Tesfaye H; Bessette LG; Zabotka L; Lee SB; Gautam N; York C; Zakoul H; Concato J; Martin D; Paraoan D; Quinto K
    JAMA; 2023 Apr; 329(16):1376-1385. PubMed ID: 37097356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of treatment effect estimates of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin between observational studies using propensity score methods and randomized controlled trials.
    Li G; Holbrook A; Jin Y; Zhang Y; Levine MA; Mbuagbaw L; Witt DM; Crowther M; Connolly S; Chai-Adisaksopha C; Wan Z; Cheng J; Thabane L
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 31(6):541-61. PubMed ID: 27370013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A matching method for improving covariate balance in cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Sekhon JS; Grieve RD
    Health Econ; 2012 Jun; 21(6):695-714. PubMed ID: 21633989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overall bias and sample sizes were unchanged in ICU trials over time: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Anthon CT; Granholm A; Perner A; Laake JH; Møller MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():189-199. PubMed ID: 31150836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No inexplicable disagreements between real-world data-based nonrandomized controlled studies and randomized controlled trials were found.
    Mathes T; Rombey T; Kuss O; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():1-13. PubMed ID: 33359322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses.
    Kuss O
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 23972521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. observational studies: propensity score analysis of non-randomized data.
    Trojano M; Pellegrini F; Paolicelli D; Fuiani A; Di Renzo V
    Int MS J; 2009 Sep; 16(3):90-7. PubMed ID: 19878631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the use and misuse of scalar scores of confounders in design and analysis of observational studies.
    Pfeiffer RM; Riedl R
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(18):2618-35. PubMed ID: 25781579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Illustration of the Impact of Unmeasured Confounding Within an Economic Evaluation Based on Nonrandomized Data.
    Guertin JR; Bowen JM; De Rose G; O'Reilly DJ; Tarride JE
    MDM Policy Pract; 2017; 2(1):2381468317697711. PubMed ID: 30288418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalizability in the family-to-family education program randomized waitlist-control trial.
    Marcus SM; Medoff D; Fang LJ; Weaver J; Duan N; Lucksted A; Dixon LB
    Psychiatr Serv; 2013 Aug; 64(8):754-63. PubMed ID: 23633161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal Studies 4: Matching Strategies to Evaluate Risk.
    James MT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():167-177. PubMed ID: 33871843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias.
    Pressler TR; Kaizar EE
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3552-68. PubMed ID: 23553373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.