BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32541288)

  • 1. Cost of Elective Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women.
    Einerson BD; Nelson RE; Sandoval G; Esplin MS; Branch DW; Metz TD; Silver RM; Grobman WA; Reddy UM; Varner M;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 136(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 32541288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic analysis comparing induction of labor and expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (PPROMEXIL trial).
    Vijgen SM; van der Ham DP; Bijlenga D; van Beek JJ; Bloemenkamp KW; Kwee A; Groenewout M; Kars MM; Kuppens S; Mantel G; Molkenboer JF; Mulder AL; Nijhuis JG; Pernet PJ; Porath M; Woiski MD; Weinans MJ; van Wijngaarden WJ; Wildschut HI; Akerboom B; Sikkema JM; Willekes C; Mol BW; Opmeer BC;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 24392746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Grobman WA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic analysis comparing induction of labour and expectant management for intrauterine growth restriction at term (DIGITAT trial).
    Vijgen SM; Boers KE; Opmeer BC; Bijlenga D; Bekedam DJ; Bloemenkamp KW; de Boer K; Bremer HA; le Cessie S; Delemarre FM; Duvekot JJ; Hasaart TH; Kwee A; van Lith JM; van Meir CA; van Pampus MG; van der Post JA; Rijken M; Roumen FJ; van der Salm PC; Spaanderman ME; Willekes C; Wijnen EJ; Mol BW; Scherjon SA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 23910171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management.
    Grobman WA; Sandoval G; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Silver RM; Mallett G; Hill K; Rice MM; El-Sayed YY; Wapner RJ; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Thorp JM; Chauhan SP; Iams JD; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):369.e1-369.e11. PubMed ID: 31930993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An economic evaluation of planned immediate versus delayed birth for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: findings from the PPROMT randomised controlled trial.
    Lain SJ; Roberts CL; Bond DM; Smith J; Morris JM
    BJOG; 2017 Mar; 124(4):623-630. PubMed ID: 27770483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
    Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
    Palatnik A; Kominiarek MA
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
    Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
    Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternal and Neonatal Hospitalization Costs Associated With Elective Induction of Labor at Term in California, 2007-2011.
    Hersh AR; Greiner KS; Garg B; Skeith AE; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 136(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 32541294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Hong J; Atkinson J; Roddy Mitchell A; Tong S; Walker SP; Middleton A; Lindquist A; Hastie R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 May; 6(5):e2313162. PubMed ID: 37171818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An economic analysis of immediate delivery and expectant monitoring in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation (HYPITAT-II).
    van Baaren GJ; Broekhuijsen K; van Pampus MG; Ganzevoort W; Sikkema JM; Woiski MD; Oudijk MA; Bloemenkamp K; Scheepers H; Bremer HA; Rijnders R; van Loon AJ; Perquin D; Sporken J; Papatsonis D; van Huizen ME; Vredevoogd CB; Brons J; Kaplan M; van Kaam AH; Groen H; Porath M; van den Berg PP; Mol B; Franssen M; Langenveld J;
    BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):453-461. PubMed ID: 26969198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Miller NR; Cypher RL; Foglia LM; Pates JA; Nielsen PE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 26551184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
    Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Labor induction at 41
    Place K; Rahkonen L; Tekay A; Väyrynen K; Orden MR; Vääräsmäki M; Uotila J; Tihtonen K; Rinne K; Mäkikallio K; Heinonen S; Kruit H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 38112629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation.
    Silver RM; Rice MM; Grobman WA; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Mallett G; Hill K; Thom EA; El-Sayed YY; Wapner RJ; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Thorp JM; Chauhan SP; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 32925634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.