151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32541294)
1. Maternal and Neonatal Hospitalization Costs Associated With Elective Induction of Labor at Term in California, 2007-2011.
Hersh AR; Greiner KS; Garg B; Skeith AE; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 136(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 32541294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Darney BG; Snowden JM; Cheng YW; Jacob L; Nicholson JM; Kaimal A; Dublin S; Getahun D; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost of Elective Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women.
Einerson BD; Nelson RE; Sandoval G; Esplin MS; Branch DW; Metz TD; Silver RM; Grobman WA; Reddy UM; Varner M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 136(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 32541288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal and infant hospitalization costs associated with maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index in California, 2007-2011.
Mischkot BF; Hersh AR; Greiner KS; Garg B; Caughey AB
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(23):4451-4460. PubMed ID: 33261530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Term Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk among Obese Women with and without Comorbidities.
Glazer KB; Danilack VA; Field AE; Werner EF; Savitz DA
Am J Perinatol; 2022 Jan; 39(2):154-164. PubMed ID: 32722823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term.
Maslow AS; Sweeny AL
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):917-22. PubMed ID: 10831992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancy: a comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond term.
Bodner-Adler B; Bodner K; Pateisky N; Kimberger O; Chalubinski K; Mayerhofer K; Husslein P
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2005 Apr; 117(7-8):287-92. PubMed ID: 15926620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of Obstetric Outcomes by Hospital Location, Volume, and Teaching Status Associated With Non-Medically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks.
Hersh AR; Bullard KA; Garg B; Arora M; Mischkot BF; Caughey AB
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Apr; 6(4):e239167. PubMed ID: 37093603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with elective cesarean section compared to induction of labor in twin pregnancies: A prospective cohort study.
Kjeldsen MH; Højlund M; Andreasen E; Khalil MR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jul; 286():85-89. PubMed ID: 37229962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study.
Lee VR; Darney BG; Snowden JM; Main EK; Gilbert W; Chung J; Caughey AB
BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 26840780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
