These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32541298)
1. Short-Term Outcomes of Vaginal Hysterectomy at the Time of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Jones K; Thompson N; Imamoglu G; Solomon E; Rastegar V; Harmanli O Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e223-e226. PubMed ID: 32541298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Perioperative Pain and Recovery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Westermann LB; Crisp CC; Mazloomdoost D; Kleeman SD; Pauls RN Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 28067743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy. Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse. Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial. Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system. Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy. Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function. De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure. Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy. Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Route of hysterectomy during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy does not affect postoperative outcomes. Davidson ERW; Thomas TN; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):649-655. PubMed ID: 30338370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse. Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 28118173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database. Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial. Svabik K; Martan A; Masata J; El-Haddad R; Hubka P Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trans-vaginal mesh surgery for management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse following abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Lo TS; Ibrahim R; Karim NB; Nawawi EA; Uy-Patrimonio MC Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):311-314. PubMed ID: 29673679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the UPHOLD LITE vaginal support system: The outcomes of 291 patients. Chang CP; Hsu FK; Lai MJ; Chang WH; Lee NR; Lee HL; Horng HC; Wang PH Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(14):e15086. PubMed ID: 30946362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]