BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32542331)

  • 1. Reoperation, Readmission, and Discharge Disposition for Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Pathology Treated With Either Open or Minimally Invasive Techniques: A Single-Center Retrospective Review of 1435 Cases.
    Altshuler M; Mueller KB; MacConnell A; Wirth P; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Nov; 87(6):1199-1205. PubMed ID: 32542331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does minimally invasive spine surgery improve outcomes in the obese population? A retrospective review of 1442 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.
    Carroll AH; Dowlati E; Molina E; Zhao D; Altshuler M; Mueller KB; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jul; 35(4):460-470. PubMed ID: 34271544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Difference in Surgical Site Infection Rates Between Open and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: A Retrospective Single Center Experience of 1442 Cases.
    Mueller K; Zhao D; Johnson O; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2019 Jun; 16(6):750-755. PubMed ID: 30107559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidental Durotomy Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease and the Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique on the Rate and Need for Surgical Revision: A Case Series.
    Mueller KB; Garrett CT; Kane S; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2021 Oct; 21(5):351-355. PubMed ID: 34460926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does minimally invasive spine surgery reduce the rate of perioperative medical complications? A retrospective single-center experience of 1435 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.
    Altshuler M; Mueller K; MacConnell A; Wirth P; Sandhu F; Voyadzis JM
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Jan; 30(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 32700125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive spine surgery for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
    Dangelmajer S; Zadnik PL; Rodriguez ST; Gokaslan ZL; Sciubba DM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E7. PubMed ID: 24785489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve.
    Ahn J; Iqbal A; Manning BT; Leblang S; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Singh K
    Spine J; 2016 Aug; 16(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 26235463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Iyer S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 30562332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Degenerative Spine Disorders for Elderly Patients: Experiences from a Single Institution.
    Yolcu YU; Helal A; Alexander AY; Bhatti AU; Alvi MA; Abode-Iyamah K; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e1262-e1269. PubMed ID: 33276177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
    Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive posterior lumbar surgery in the morbidly obese, obese and non-obese populations: A single institution retrospective review.
    Molina E; Zhao D; Dowlati E; Carroll AH; Mueller KB; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 207():106746. PubMed ID: 34144463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting.
    Hirsch BP; Khechen B; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(8):E494-E499. PubMed ID: 30234800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20927557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.