These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32542331)

  • 1. Reoperation, Readmission, and Discharge Disposition for Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Pathology Treated With Either Open or Minimally Invasive Techniques: A Single-Center Retrospective Review of 1435 Cases.
    Altshuler M; Mueller KB; MacConnell A; Wirth P; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Nov; 87(6):1199-1205. PubMed ID: 32542331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does minimally invasive spine surgery improve outcomes in the obese population? A retrospective review of 1442 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.
    Carroll AH; Dowlati E; Molina E; Zhao D; Altshuler M; Mueller KB; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Oct; 35(4):460-470. PubMed ID: 34271544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Difference in Surgical Site Infection Rates Between Open and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: A Retrospective Single Center Experience of 1442 Cases.
    Mueller K; Zhao D; Johnson O; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2019 Jun; 16(6):750-755. PubMed ID: 30107559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidental Durotomy Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease and the Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique on the Rate and Need for Surgical Revision: A Case Series.
    Mueller KB; Garrett CT; Kane S; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2021 Oct; 21(5):351-355. PubMed ID: 34460926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does minimally invasive spine surgery reduce the rate of perioperative medical complications? A retrospective single-center experience of 1435 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.
    Altshuler M; Mueller K; MacConnell A; Wirth P; Sandhu F; Voyadzis JM
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Jan; 30(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 32700125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive spine surgery for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
    Dangelmajer S; Zadnik PL; Rodriguez ST; Gokaslan ZL; Sciubba DM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E7. PubMed ID: 24785489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve.
    Ahn J; Iqbal A; Manning BT; Leblang S; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Singh K
    Spine J; 2016 Aug; 16(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 26235463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Iyer S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 30562332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Degenerative Spine Disorders for Elderly Patients: Experiences from a Single Institution.
    Yolcu YU; Helal A; Alexander AY; Bhatti AU; Alvi MA; Abode-Iyamah K; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e1262-e1269. PubMed ID: 33276177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
    Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive posterior lumbar surgery in the morbidly obese, obese and non-obese populations: A single institution retrospective review.
    Molina E; Zhao D; Dowlati E; Carroll AH; Mueller KB; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 207():106746. PubMed ID: 34144463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting.
    Hirsch BP; Khechen B; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(8):E494-E499. PubMed ID: 30234800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20927557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.