829 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32542409)
1. Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.
Hartwig A; Arand M; Epe B; Guth S; Jahnke G; Lampen A; Martus HJ; Monien B; Rietjens IMCM; Schmitz-Spanke S; Schriever-Schwemmer G; Steinberg P; Eisenbrand G
Arch Toxicol; 2020 Jun; 94(6):1787-1877. PubMed ID: 32542409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An integrative test strategy for cancer hazard identification.
Luijten M; Olthof ED; Hakkert BC; Rorije E; van der Laan JW; Woutersen RA; van Benthem J
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2016 Aug; 46(7):615-39. PubMed ID: 27142259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Qualitative and quantitative approaches in the dose-response assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.
Fukushima S; Gi M; Kakehashi A; Wanibuchi H; Matsumoto M
Mutagenesis; 2016 May; 31(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 26152227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenging dogma: thresholds for genotoxic carcinogens? The case of vinyl acetate.
Hengstler JG; Bogdanffy MS; Bolt HM; Oesch F
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 2003; 43():485-520. PubMed ID: 12415124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review.
Chappell G; Pogribny IP; Guyton KZ; Rusyn I
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2016; 768():27-45. PubMed ID: 27234561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of hepatocarcinogen-induced gene expression profiles in conventional primary rat hepatocytes with in vivo rat liver.
Doktorova TY; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; van Delft J; Kleinjans J; Ahr HJ; Rogiers V
Arch Toxicol; 2012 Sep; 86(9):1399-411. PubMed ID: 22484513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Qualitative and quantitative procedures for health risk assessment.
Lohman PH
Mutat Res; 1999 Jul; 428(1-2):237-54. PubMed ID: 10517997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydroquinone: an evaluation of the human risks from its carcinogenic and mutagenic properties.
McGregor D
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(10):887-914. PubMed ID: 18027166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of toxicogenomics to study mechanisms of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Aubrecht J; Kleinjans JC; Ahr HJ
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Apr; 186(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 18822359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk assessment of dietary exposures to compounds that are genotoxic and carcinogenic--an overview.
Dybing E; O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Sanner T
Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 18584977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prospects for a simplified and internationally harmonized approach to the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.
Ashby J
Mutagenesis; 1986 Jan; 1(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 3325732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human carcinogenic risk evaluation, part II: contributions of the EUROTOX specialty section for carcinogenesis.
Bolt HM; Degen GH
Toxicol Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15159528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.
Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D
Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of thresholds on the risk assessment of carcinogens in food.
Pratt I; Barlow S; Kleiner J; Larsen JC
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19442758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The parallelogram approach in studies of genotoxic effects.
Anderson D; Sorsa M; Waters MD
Mutat Res; 1994; 313(2-3):101-15. PubMed ID: 7523897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.
Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S
Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cobalt and antimony: genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
De Boeck M; Kirsch-Volders M; Lison D
Mutat Res; 2003 Dec; 533(1-2):135-52. PubMed ID: 14643417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
