323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32542512)
21. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of penalizing factor in a block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for
Bjöersdorff M; Oddstig J; Karindotter-Borgendahl N; Almquist H; Zackrisson S; Minarik D; Trägårdh E
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Mar; 6(1):5. PubMed ID: 30900064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals.
Lantos J; Mittra ES; Levin CS; Iagaru A
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018; 8(2):110-118. PubMed ID: 29755844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on image quality in novel digital PET/CT: clinical implications for the assessment of lung tumors.
Messerli M; Stolzmann P; Egger-Sigg M; Trinckauf J; D'Aguanno S; Burger IA; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Sep; 5(1):27. PubMed ID: 30255439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image reconstruction methods affect software-aided assessment of pathologies of [
Lindström E; Oddstig J; Danfors T; Jögi J; Hansson O; Lubberink M
Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 28():102386. PubMed ID: 32882645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Artificial intelligence for detecting small FDG-positive lung nodules in digital PET/CT: impact of image reconstructions on diagnostic performance.
Schwyzer M; Martini K; Benz DC; Burger IA; Ferraro DA; Kudura K; Treyer V; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW; Messerli M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):2031-2040. PubMed ID: 31822970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [
Liberini V; Messerli M; Husmann L; Kudura K; Grünig H; Maurer A; Skawran S; Orita E; Pizzuto DA; Deandreis D; Dummer R; Mangana J; Mihic-Probst D; Rupp N; Huellner MW
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):8011-8020. PubMed ID: 33768288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reduction of [
Cox CPW; Brabander T; Vegt E; de Lussanet de la Sablonière QG; Graven LH; Verburg FA; Segbers M
EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Mar; 11(1):27. PubMed ID: 38488989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of time of flight and point spread function on quantitative parameters of lung lesions in
Huang K; Feng Y; Liang W; Li L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34773998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction on quantitative and qualitative aspects for pulmonary nodule detection in digital 2-[
Lohaus N; Enderlin F; Skawran S; Maurer A; Abukwaik AMA; Franzen D; Huellner MW; Messerli M
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8308. PubMed ID: 35585129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight
Jonmarker O; Axelsson R; Nilsson T; Gabrielson S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33807370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Optimization of [
Trägårdh E; Minarik D; Brolin G; Bitzén U; Olsson B; Oddstig J
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 May; 7(1):31. PubMed ID: 32399664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on
Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Farzanehfar S; Ghafarian P; Moafpurian Y; Ay M
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Oct; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 37843705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of different image reconstructions on PET quantification in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Messerli M; Kotasidis F; Burger IA; Ferraro DA; Muehlematter UJ; Weyermann C; Kenkel D; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW
Br J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 92(1096):20180792. PubMed ID: 30673302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical evaluation of reconstruction and acquisition time for pediatric
Shkumat NA; Vali R; Shammas A
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Jun; 50(7):966-972. PubMed ID: 32125447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
