These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Evaluation of expandable titanium endosseous implants in a dog. Gourley IM; Viscido AJ; Richards LW; Pool RR J Oral Implantol; 1981; 9(4):538-47. PubMed ID: 6951057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs. Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations. Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo evaluation of plasma-sprayed titanium coating after alkali modification. Xue W; Liu X; Zheng X; Ding C Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(16):3029-37. PubMed ID: 15603798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of three different dental implants in ligature-induced peri-implantitis in the beagle dog. Part I. Clinical evaluation. Tillmanns HW; Hermann JS; Cagna DR; Burgess AV; Meffert RM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):611-20. PubMed ID: 9337021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on the osteoconductivity of commercially pure titanium implants. Strnad Z; Strnad J; Povýsil C; Urban K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 10960980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants. Wheeler SL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 8752555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report. Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Carlsson L; Röstlund T; Albrektsson B; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1988; 3(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 3250932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reverse-torque failure of screw-shaped implants in baboons after 6 months of healing. Carr AB; Beals DW; Larsen PE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 9337019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles. Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative investigation in dogs: 2-year morphometric results of the dental implant--bone interface. Steflik DE; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Davis HC; Adams BO; Yavari J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 8820118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Reaction of the peri-implant tissue to titanium implants under stress]. Krekeler G; Schilli W Quintessenz; 1984 Feb; 35(2):343-50. PubMed ID: 6591252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]