These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32543973)

  • 1. Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the cognitive work analysis design toolkit (CWA-DT).
    Read GJM; Salmon PM; Goode N; van Mulken M; Lenné MG; Stevens N; Walker GH
    Ergonomics; 2020 Oct; 63(10):1221-1239. PubMed ID: 32543973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When paradigms collide at the road rail interface: evaluation of a sociotechnical systems theory design toolkit for cognitive work analysis.
    Read GJ; Salmon PM; Lenné MG
    Ergonomics; 2016 Sep; 59(9):1135-57. PubMed ID: 26967660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the event analysis of systemic teamwork (EAST) to explore conflicts between different road user groups when making right hand turns at urban intersections.
    Salmon PM; Lenne MG; Walker GH; Stanton NA; Filtness A
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(11):1628-42. PubMed ID: 25205241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the 'system' in safe systems-based road designs: using cognitive work analysis to evaluate intersection designs.
    Cornelissen M; Salmon PM; Stanton NA; McClure R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():324-38. PubMed ID: 24225066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using cognitive work analysis and the strategies analysis diagram to understand variability in road user behaviour at intersections.
    Cornelissen M; Salmon PM; McClure R; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(5):764-80. PubMed ID: 23514010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Designing a ticket to ride with the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit.
    Read GJ; Salmon PM; Lenné MG; Jenkins DP
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(8):1266-86. PubMed ID: 25805238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who is to blame for crashes involving autonomous vehicles? Exploring blame attribution across the road transport system.
    Pöllänen E; Read GJM; Lane BR; Thompson J; Salmon PM
    Ergonomics; 2020 May; 63(5):525-537. PubMed ID: 32180531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety effects of roundabouts in Flanders: signal type, speed limits and vulnerable road users.
    De Brabander B; Vereeck L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):591-9. PubMed ID: 17118323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representing two road traffic collisions in one Accimap: highlighting the importance of emergency response and enforcement in a low-income country.
    Hamim OF; Hoque MS; McIlroy RC; Plant KL; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2020 Dec; 63(12):1512-1524. PubMed ID: 32757883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads.
    Domenichini L; Branzi V; Meocci M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():38-51. PubMed ID: 29101788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sociotechnical Factors Supporting Mobile Phone Use by Bus Drivers.
    Phillips RO; Berge SH
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 36657015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing car drivers' and motorcyclists' opinions about junction crashes.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():304-317. PubMed ID: 29753219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating pedestrian vehicle interaction dynamics at un-signalized intersections: A proactive approach for safety analysis.
    Kathuria A; Vedagiri P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jan; 134():105316. PubMed ID: 31677475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observing the observation of (vulnerable) road user behaviour and traffic safety: A scoping review.
    van Haperen W; Riaz MS; Daniels S; Saunier N; Brijs T; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():211-221. PubMed ID: 30529992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of car crashes resulting in fatal and serious injuries to analyze a safe road transport system model and to identify system weaknesses.
    Stigson H; Hill J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Oct; 10(5):441-50. PubMed ID: 19746308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of passenger engagement through road safety bus stickers in public service vehicles on road traffic crashes in Zambia: a randomized controlled trial.
    Phiri SC; Prescott MR; Prust ML; McCarthy EA; Kanchele CC; Haimbe P; Shakwelele H; Mudhune S
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):872. PubMed ID: 30005647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An exploration of alternative intersection designs in the context of Safe System.
    Candappa N; Logan D; Van Nes N; Corben B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():314-23. PubMed ID: 25173928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring road design factors influencing tram road safety - Melbourne tram driver focus groups.
    Naznin F; Currie G; Logan D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():52-61. PubMed ID: 29101789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The driver, the road, the rules … and the rest? A systems-based approach to young driver road safety.
    Scott-Parker B; Goode N; Salmon P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():297-305. PubMed ID: 24602807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.