293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32544033)
1. Ultra-High-
Mokry T; Mlynarska-Bujny A; Kuder TA; Hasse FC; Hog R; Wallwiener M; Dinkic C; Brucker J; Sinn P; Gnirs R; Kauczor HU; Schlemmer HP; Rom J; Bickelhaupt S
Radiology; 2020 Aug; 296(2):358-369. PubMed ID: 32544033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Kaur G; Manchanda S; Sharma R; Vyas S; Kandasamy D; Hari S; Bhatla N; Mathur SR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 May; 49(5):1512-1521. PubMed ID: 38607571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiating between malignant and benign solid solitary pulmonary lesions: are intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging superior to conventional diffusion-weighted imaging?
Wan Q; Deng YS; Lei Q; Bao YY; Wang YZ; Zhou JX; Zou Q; Li XC
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1607-1615. PubMed ID: 30255258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of diffusion kurtosis imaging in characterization of breast lesions.
Christou A; Ghiatas A; Priovolos D; Veliou K; Bougias H
Br J Radiol; 2017 May; 90(1073):20160873. PubMed ID: 28383279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion kurtosis imaging does not improve differentiation performance of breast lesions in a short clinical protocol.
Palm T; Wenkel E; Ohlmeyer S; Janka R; Uder M; Weiland E; Bickelhaupt S; Ladd ME; Zaitsev M; Hensel B; Laun FB
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():205-216. PubMed ID: 31425816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion MRI of uterine and ovarian masses: identifying the benign lesions.
Davarpanah AH; Kambadakone A; Holalkere NS; Guimaraes AR; Hahn PF; Lee SI
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2466-2475. PubMed ID: 27660280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Hottat NA; Badr DA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):158-170. PubMed ID: 34797013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
Partridge SC; Mullins CD; Kurland BF; Allain MD; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1664-73. PubMed ID: 20489111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Sufficient Conventional Diffusion-weighted MRI Metric to Improve Breast MRI Diagnostic Performance: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group A6702 Diffusion Imaging Trial.
McDonald ES; Romanoff J; Rahbar H; Kitsch AE; Harvey SM; Whisenant JG; Yankeelov TE; Moy L; DeMartini WB; Dogan BE; Yang WT; Wang LC; Joe BN; Wilmes LJ; Hylton NM; Oh KY; Tudorica LA; Neal CH; Malyarenko DI; Comstock CE; Schnall MD; Chenevert TL; Partridge SC
Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 33201788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging-Based Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Differentiating Malignant from Benign Masses in Head and Neck Region.
Ma G; Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Shen J; Shi HB; Wu FY
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 29713222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ADC-derived spatial features can accurately classify adnexal lesions.
Fathi Kazerooni A; Nabil M; Haghighat Khah H; Alviri M; Heidari-Sooreshjaani M; Gity M; Malek M; Saligheh Rad H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 28901638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB
Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion kurtosis MRI versus conventional diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease.
Huang L; Li XH; Huang SY; Zhang ZW; Yang XF; Lin JJ; Jiang MJ; Feng ST; Sun CH; Li ZP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Mar; 47(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 28577319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of standard diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging with distant metastases of rectal carcinoma.
Yu J; Huang DY; Li Y; Dai X; Shi HB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):221-9. PubMed ID: 26715111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.
Suo ST; Chen XX; Fan Y; Wu LM; Yao QY; Cao MQ; Liu Q; Xu JR
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1027-34. PubMed ID: 24833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating between the benign and malignant sinonasal lesions.
Jiang JX; Tang ZH; Zhong YF; Qiang JW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 27758016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adding a Model-free Diffusion MRI Marker to BI-RADS Assessment Improves Specificity for Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Goto M; Le Bihan D; Yoshida M; Sakai K; Yamada K
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 31112086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histogram analysis of breast diffusion kurtosis imaging: a comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence.
Huang C; Zhan C; Hu Y; Yin T; Grimm R; Ai T
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Feb; 13(2):735-746. PubMed ID: 36819265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
