These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32544957)

  • 1. Usefulness of mean number of adenomas per positive screenee for identifying meticulous endoscopists among those who achieve acceptable adenoma detection rates.
    Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Wisedopas N; Kongtab N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 32544957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per positive participant as new quality parameters in screening colonoscopy.
    Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30138613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serrated polyp detection rate and advanced adenoma detection rate from a US multicenter cohort.
    Klair JS; Ashat M; Johnson D; Arora S; Onteddu N; Machain Palacio JG; Samuel R; Bilal M; Buddam A; Gupta A; Gunderson A; Guturu P; Soota K; Chandra S; Murali AR
    Endoscopy; 2020 Jan; 52(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 31739370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adenomas per colonoscopy and adenoma per positive participant as quality indicators for screening colonoscopy.
    Wang S; Kim AS; Church TR; Perdue DG; Shaukat A
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):E1560-E1565. PubMed ID: 33140011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of adenoma detection rate on detection of advanced adenomas and endoscopic adverse events in a study of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies.
    Penz D; Ferlitsch A; Waldmann E; Irina G; Daniel P; Asaturi A; Hinterberger A; Majcher B; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 31499041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.
    Han JH; Kim HG; Ahn EM; Park S; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Kwak MS; Jung Y; Shin JE; Shin HD; Cho YS
    Gut Liver; 2022 Sep; 16(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 34933279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
    Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.
    El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors.
    Waldmann E; Penz D; Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Rinner C; Jiricka L; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gut; 2021 Jul; 70(7):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 33023903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy.
    Waldmann E; Kammerlander AA; Gessl I; Penz D; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Bretthauer M; Trauner MH; Ferlitsch M
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1890-1898. PubMed ID: 33878471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test.
    Hilsden RJ; Bridges R; Dube C; McGregor SE; Naugler C; Rose SM; Rostom A; Heitman SJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 27725649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study.
    Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
    Dig Endosc; 2024 Jan; 36(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 37953649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linked color imaging, mucosal exposure device, their combination, and standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.
    Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Piyachaturawat P; Jangsirikul S; Luangsukrerk T; Kulpatcharapong S; Tiankanon K; Kongtab N; Wisedopas N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Nov; 94(5):969-977. PubMed ID: 34081966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can the adenoma detection rate reliably identify low-performing endoscopists? Results of a modeling study.
    Saini SD; Schoenfeld P; Vijan S
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(7):1856-62. PubMed ID: 23456494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expert endoscopists with high adenoma detection rates frequently detect diminutive adenomas in proximal colon.
    Toyoshima O; Nishizawa T; Yoshida S; Sekiba K; Kataoka Y; Hata K; Watanabe H; Tsuji Y; Koike K
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E775-E782. PubMed ID: 32490163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Quality Measures for Detection of Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy.
    Wieszczy P; Bugajski M; Januszewicz W; Rupinska M; Szlak J; Pisera M; Turkot MH; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Regula J; Kaminski MF
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Jan; 21(1):200-209.e6. PubMed ID: 35341951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
    Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.