BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

634 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32545561)

  • 1. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
    Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is production system a relevant attribute in consumers' food preferences? The case of Iberian dry-cured ham in Spain.
    Díaz-Caro C; García-Torres S; Elghannam A; Tejerina D; Mesias FJ; Ortiz A
    Meat Sci; 2019 Dec; 158():107908. PubMed ID: 31446367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding consumers' perceptions towards Iberian pig production and animal welfare.
    García-Gudiño J; Blanco-Penedo I; Gispert M; Brun A; Perea J; Font-I-Furnols M
    Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108317. PubMed ID: 32980720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for safe pork products in rural Kenya.
    Gichuyia CM; Mtimet N; Fèvre EM; Thomas LF; Gathura PB; Onono JO; Akaichi F
    Meat Sci; 2024 May; 211():109450. PubMed ID: 38350245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer Perception of Retail Pork Bacon Attributes Using Adaptive Choice-based Conjoint Analysis and Maximum Differential Scaling.
    McLean KG; Hanson DJ; Jervis SM; Drake MA
    J Food Sci; 2017 Nov; 82(11):2659-2668. PubMed ID: 29058811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?
    Hempel C; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():309-318. PubMed ID: 26432955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries.
    Lin-Schilstra L; Backus G; Snoek H; Mörlein D
    Meat Sci; 2022 May; 187():108736. PubMed ID: 35123247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meat packaging, preservation, and marketing implications: Consumer preferences in an emerging economy.
    Wang HH; Chen J; Bai J; Lai J
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():300-307. PubMed ID: 30007176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Heterogeneity of Consumer Preferences for Meat Safety Attributes in Traditional Markets.
    Nugraha WS; Yang SH; Ujiie K
    Foods; 2021 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 33809468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumers' perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled 'raised without antibiotics'.
    Bradford H; McKernan C; Elliott C; Dean M
    Appetite; 2022 Apr; 171():105900. PubMed ID: 34968563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumers' preferences for freezing of meat to prevent toxoplasmosis- A stated preference approach.
    Lambooij MS; Veldwijk J; van Gils P; Mangen MJ; Over E; Suijkerbuijk A; Polder J; de Wit GA; Opsteegh M
    Meat Sci; 2019 Mar; 149():1-8. PubMed ID: 30448472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors that predict consumer acceptance of enriched processed meats.
    Shan LC; Henchion M; De Brún A; Murrin C; Wall PG; Monahan FJ
    Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():185-193. PubMed ID: 28711465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of traceability label trust on consumers' traceability pork purchasing behavior: Based on the moderating effect of food safety identification.
    Liu Z; Yu Z; Zhao J; Han X; Li C; Geng N; Yu M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306041. PubMed ID: 38941301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health Innovation in Patty Products. The Role of Food Neophobia in Consumers' Non-Hypothetical Willingness to Pay, Purchase Intention and Hedonic Evaluation.
    Kallas Z; Vitale M; Gil JM
    Nutrients; 2019 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30791660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diversity of Japanese consumers' requirements, sensory perceptions, and eating preferences for meat.
    Sasaki K
    Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13705. PubMed ID: 35266248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring consumers' attitude towards cultured meat in Italy.
    Mancini MC; Antonioli F
    Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():101-110. PubMed ID: 30616073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consumer Preferences for Traceable Food with Different Functions of Safety Information Attributes: Evidence from a Menu-Based Choice Experiment in China.
    Hou B; Hou J; Wu L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31878189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.