637 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32545561)
21. The price of good welfare: Does informing consumers about what on-package labels mean for animal welfare influence their purchase intentions?
Cornish AR; Briley D; Wilson BJ; Raubenheimer D; Schlosberg D; McGreevy PD
Appetite; 2020 May; 148():104577. PubMed ID: 31904389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.
Merlino VM; Borra D; Girgenti V; Dal Vecchio A; Massaglia S
Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():119-128. PubMed ID: 29738962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing Consumer Willingness to Pay for Nutritional Information Using a Dietary App.
Sadrmousavigargari S; Cubero Dudinskaya E; Mandolesi S; Naspetti S; Mojaverian SM; Zanoli R
Nutrients; 2022 Nov; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 36501053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
Sonoda Y; Oishi K; Chomei Y; Hirooka H
Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Consumer attitudes and preferences towards pangasius and tilapia: The role of sustainability certification and the country of origin.
Hinkes C; Schulze-Ehlers B
Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():171-181. PubMed ID: 29733863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Eliciting Egg Consumer Preferences for Organic Labels and Omega 3 Claims in Italy and Hungary.
Yeh CH; Menozzi D; Török Á
Foods; 2020 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32882950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of quality labels on the formation of preferences of lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study.
Bernabéu R; Rabadán A; El Orche NE; Díaz M
Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():129-133. PubMed ID: 28968556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Consumption of fresh Iberian pork: Two-stage cluster for the identification of segments of consumers according to their habits and lifestyles.
Ortiz A; Díaz-Caro C; Tejerina D; Escribano M; Crespo E; Gaspar P
Meat Sci; 2021 Mar; 173():108373. PubMed ID: 33234339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Consumer preferences for food labels on tomatoes in Germany - A comparison of a quasi-experiment and two stated preference approaches.
Meyerding SGH
Appetite; 2016 Aug; 103():105-112. PubMed ID: 27037221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.
Menozzi D; Nguyen TT; Sogari G; Taskov D; Lucas S; Castro-Rial JLS; Mora C
Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32878105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. "Animals are friends, not food": Anthropomorphism leads to less favorable attitudes toward meat consumption by inducing feelings of anticipatory guilt.
Wang F; Basso F
Appetite; 2019 Jul; 138():153-173. PubMed ID: 30905735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier - A conjoint analysis study.
Shan LC; De Brún A; Henchion M; Li C; Murrin C; Wall PG; Monahan FJ
Meat Sci; 2017 Sep; 131():82-89. PubMed ID: 28494317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of an eco-score label on US consumers' perceptions of environmental sustainability and intentions to purchase food: A randomized experiment.
Taillie LS; Wolfson JA; Prestemon CE; Bercholz M; Ewoldt L; Ruggles PR; Hall MG
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306123. PubMed ID: 38935699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.
Slade P
Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():428-437. PubMed ID: 29501683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.
Lundeberg PJ; Graham DJ; Mohr GS
Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():548-556. PubMed ID: 29496604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of nutritional warnings and other label features on consumers' choice: Results from an eye-tracking study.
Tórtora G; Machín L; Ares G
Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():605-611. PubMed ID: 30884695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef.
Schulze M; Spiller A; Risius A
Meat Sci; 2021 Jul; 177():108494. PubMed ID: 33780871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Traditional attributes moo-ve over for some consumer segments: Relative ranking of fluid milk attributes.
Bir C; Widmar NO; Wolf C; Delgado MS
Appetite; 2019 Mar; 134():162-171. PubMed ID: 30550891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preferences for lamb meat: a choice experiment for Spanish consumers.
Gracia A; de-Magistris T
Meat Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 23747635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
