These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32545561)

  • 41. Consumers' expected quality and intention to purchase high quality pork meat.
    Papanagiotou P; Tzimitra-Kalogianni I; Melfou K
    Meat Sci; 2013 Mar; 93(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 23273449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Natural Experiment: Using Immersive Technologies to Study the Impact of "All-Natural" Labeling on Perceived Food Quality, Nutritional Content, and Liking.
    Liu R; Hooker NH; Parasidis E; Simons CT
    J Food Sci; 2017 Mar; 82(3):825-833. PubMed ID: 28178361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.
    Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Can innovations in traditional pork products help thriving EU untapped pig breeds? A non-hypothetical discrete choice experiment with hedonic evaluation.
    Kallas Z; Varela E; Čandek-Potokar M; Pugliese C; Cerjak M; Tomažin U; Karolyi D; Aquilani C; Vitale M; Gil JM
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():75-85. PubMed ID: 31004943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Consumers' Preferences for Purchasing mHealth Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Xie Z; Or CK
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Sep; 11():e25908. PubMed ID: 37707310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels.
    Peschel AO; Grebitus C; Steiner B; Veeman M
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():78-91. PubMed ID: 26944229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Functional or constructive attitudes: Which type drives consumers' evaluation of meat products?
    Hamlin R
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():97-107. PubMed ID: 26970290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.
    Verbeke W; Liu R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Organic Food Purchases in an Emerging Market: The Influence of Consumers' Personal Factors and Green Marketing Practices of Food Stores.
    Nguyen HV; Nguyen N; Nguyen BK; Lobo A; Vu PA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 30909390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Consumer perception of health properties and of other attributes of beef as determinants of consumption and purchase decisions.
    Gutkowska K; Czarnecki J; Głąbska D; Guzek D; Batóg A
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2018; 69(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 30525333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Consumer preferences for red deer meat: a discrete choice analysis considering attitudes towards wild game meat and hunting.
    Demartini E; Vecchiato D; Tempesta T; Gaviglio A; Viganò R
    Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():168-179. PubMed ID: 30173016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Attitudes towards honey among Italian consumers: A choice experiment approach.
    Cosmina M; Gallenti G; Marangon F; Troiano S
    Appetite; 2016 Apr; 99():52-58. PubMed ID: 26719101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Organic Consumer Choices for Nutrient Labels on Dried Strawberries among Different Health Attitude Segments in Norway, Romania, and Turkey.
    Almli VL; Asioli D; Rocha C
    Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 31817079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Consumers' Preference for the Consumption of the Fresh Black Slavonian Pig's Meat.
    Jelić Milković S; Lončarić R; Kralik I; Kristić J; Crnčan A; Djurkin Kušec I; Canavari M
    Foods; 2023 Mar; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 36981181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ducrot P; Julia C; Méjean C; Kesse-Guyot E; Touvier M; Fezeu LK; Hercberg S; Péneau S
    Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 26699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Pork choice.
    Ngapo TM; Rubio Lozano MS; Braña Varela D
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():27-35. PubMed ID: 28863351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Choice Experiment Assessment of Consumer Preferences for Yogurt Products Attributes: Evidence from Taiwan.
    Chang MY; Huang CC; Du YC; Chen HS
    Nutrients; 2022 Aug; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 36079781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Who Buys Products with Nutrition and Health Claims? A Purchase Simulation with Eye Tracking on the Influence of Consumers' Nutrition Knowledge and Health Motivation.
    Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
    Nutrients; 2019 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 31547369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Are consumers willing to pay more for reformulated processed meat products in the context of the implementation of nutritional warnings? Case study with frankfurters in Chile.
    Schnettler B; Ares G; Sepúlveda N; Bravo S; Villalobos B; Hueche C; Lobos G
    Meat Sci; 2019 Jun; 152():104-108. PubMed ID: 30844619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quality attributes and harmful components of cured meats: Exploring the attitudes of Italian consumers towards healthier cooked ham.
    Di Vita G; Blanc S; Brun F; Bracco S; D'Amico M
    Meat Sci; 2019 Sep; 155():8-15. PubMed ID: 31048239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.