These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32546155)

  • 1. Creatine kinase elevation after robotic surgery for rectal cancer due to a prolonged lithotomy position.
    Tsuchiya Y; Munakata S; Tsukamoto R; Okazawa Y; Mizukoshi K; Sugimoto K; Takahashi M; Tomiki YKY; Sakamoto K
    BMC Surg; 2020 Jun; 20(1):136. PubMed ID: 32546155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing risk factors for elevated creatine kinase levels as an indicator of compartment syndrome following laparoscopic or robot-assisted colorectal cancer surgery in the lithotomy-trendelenburg position.
    Kusunoki C; Uemura M; Takeda M; Sekido Y; Hata T; Hamabe A; Ogino T; Miyoshi N; Kagawa Y; Tei M; Eguchi H; Doki Y
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Oct; 38(10):6139-6145. PubMed ID: 39214881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term Outcomes Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Technically Demanding Rectal Cancer.
    Numata M; Kazama K; Onodera A; Hara K; Atsumi Y; Okamoto H; Aoyama T; Tamagawa H; Godai T; Saeki H; Yukawa N; Shiozawa M; Rino Y; Masuda M
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Apr; 40(4):2337-2342. PubMed ID: 32234935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes.
    Shiomi A; Kinugasa Y; Yamaguchi T; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1701-10. PubMed ID: 27599703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
    Levic K; Donatsky AM; Bulut O; Rosenberg J
    Surg Innov; 2015 Aug; 22(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 25377216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Goto T; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Hosoda K; Kaizu T; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):753-764. PubMed ID: 35555973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positioning injury, rhabdomyolysis, and serum creatine kinase-concentration course in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
    Mattei A; Di Pierro GB; Rafeld V; Konrad C; Beutler J; Danuser H
    J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 22770120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
    Hu KY; Wu R; Szabo A; Ridolfi TJ; Ludwig KA; Peterson CY
    J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():495-501. PubMed ID: 32622164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic Colorectal Surgery Learning Curve and Case Complexity.
    Shaw DD; Wright M; Taylor L; Bertelson NL; Shashidharan M; Menon P; Menon V; Wood S; Ternent CA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 29733247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.
    Crolla RMPH; Mulder PG; van der Schelling GP
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4562-4570. PubMed ID: 29761276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: single-center, retrospective, propensity score analyses.
    Mazaki J; Ishizaki T; Kuboyama Y; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Yamada T; Nagakawa Y
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):157. PubMed ID: 38568362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):959-969. PubMed ID: 36413257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furuatni A; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Hino H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1755-1762. PubMed ID: 30191369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kowalewski KF; Seifert L; Ali S; Schmidt MW; Seide S; Haney C; Tapking C; Shamiyeh A; Kulu Y; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 32025924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative peripheral nerve injury related to lithotomy positioning with steep Trendelenburg in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery - A systematic review.
    Bjøro B; Mykkeltveit I; Rustøen T; Candas Altinbas B; Røise O; Bentsen SB
    J Adv Nurs; 2020 Feb; 76(2):490-503. PubMed ID: 31736124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does obesity impact postoperative outcomes following robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer?
    Duchalais E; Machairas N; Kelley SR; Landmann RG; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Mathis KL; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4886-4892. PubMed ID: 29987562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.