152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32546735)
1. Bayesian Hyper-LASSO Classification for Feature Selection with Application to Endometrial Cancer RNA-seq Data.
Jiang L; Greenwood CMT; Yao W; Li L
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9747. PubMed ID: 32546735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Novel Algorithm for Feature Selection Using Penalized Regression with Applications to Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.
Sen Puliparambil B; Tomal JH; Yan Y
Biology (Basel); 2022 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 36290397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel non-negative Bayesian stacking modeling method for Cancer survival prediction using high-dimensional omics data.
Shen J; Wang S; Sun H; Huang J; Bai L; Wang X; Dong Y; Tang Z
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):105. PubMed ID: 38702624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stable feature selection for clinical prediction: exploiting ICD tree structure using Tree-Lasso.
Kamkar I; Gupta SK; Phung D; Venkatesh S
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():277-90. PubMed ID: 25500636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for grouped predictor variables or pathways in high-dimensional penalized Cox regression models.
Belhechmi S; Bin R; Rotolo F; Michiels S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 32615919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian LASSO, scale space and decision making in association genetics.
Pasanen L; Holmström L; Sillanpää MJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120017. PubMed ID: 25856391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification with correlated features: unreliability of feature ranking and solutions.
Tolosi L; Lengauer T
Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 27(14):1986-94. PubMed ID: 21576180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene selection for microarray gene expression classification using Bayesian Lasso quantile regression.
Algamal ZY; Alhamzawi R; Mohammad Ali HT
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jun; 97():145-152. PubMed ID: 29729489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian penalized cumulative logit model for high-dimensional data with an ordinal response.
Zhang Y; Archer KJ
Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(6):1453-1481. PubMed ID: 33336826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overcoming the inadaptability of sparse group lasso for data with various group structures by stacking.
He H; Guo X; Yu J; Ai C; Shi S
Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 38(6):1542-1549. PubMed ID: 34908103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AucPR: an AUC-based approach using penalized regression for disease prediction with high-dimensional omics data.
Yu W; Park T
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S1. PubMed ID: 25559769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stabilizing l1-norm prediction models by supervised feature grouping.
Kamkar I; Gupta SK; Phung D; Venkatesh S
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Feb; 59():149-68. PubMed ID: 26689771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational analysis for identification of the extracellular matrix molecules involved in endometrial cancer progression.
Yadav VK; Lee TY; Hsu JB; Huang HD; Yang WV; Chang TH
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231594. PubMed ID: 32315343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unlocking the Potential of the CA2, CA7, and ITM2C Gene Signatures for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of RNA-Seq Data by Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms.
Maurya NS; Kushwaha S; Vetukuri RR; Mani A
Genes (Basel); 2023 Sep; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 37895185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting drug-target interaction network using deep learning model.
You J; McLeod RD; Hu P
Comput Biol Chem; 2019 Jun; 80():90-101. PubMed ID: 30939415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A sparse negative binomial mixture model for clustering RNA-seq count data.
Li Y; Rahman T; Ma T; Tang L; Tseng GC
Biostatistics; 2022 Dec; 24(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 34363675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification.
Halla-Aho V; Lähdesmäki H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):119. PubMed ID: 35379172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonidentical twins: Comparison of frequentist and Bayesian lasso for Cox models.
Zucknick M; Saadati M; Benner A
Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):959-81. PubMed ID: 26417963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structured Penalized Logistic Regression for Gene Selection in Gene Expression Data Analysis.
Liu C; Wong HS
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(1):312-321. PubMed ID: 29989970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A penalized regression approach for DNA copy number study using the sequencing data.
Lee J; Chen J
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2019 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 31145697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
