These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma. Zhai G; Shirzaei M; Manga M; Chen X Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Aug; 116(33):16228-16233. PubMed ID: 31358640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of aseismic slip in hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity. Eyre TS; Eaton DW; Garagash DI; Zecevic M; Venieri M; Weir R; Lawton DC Sci Adv; 2019 Aug; 5(8):eaav7172. PubMed ID: 31489366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interdependent effects of fluid injection parameters on triggered aseismic slip and seismicity. Mandal R; Lui SKY Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):20922. PubMed ID: 36463387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Episodic creep events on the San Andreas Fault caused by pore-pressure variations. Khoshmanesh M; Shirzaei M Nat Geosci; 2018 Aug; 11(8):610-614. PubMed ID: 29937919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hindcasting injection-induced aseismic slip and microseismicity at the Cooper Basin Enhanced Geothermal Systems Project. Wang TA; Dunham EM Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19481. PubMed ID: 36376409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fault valving and pore pressure evolution in simulations of earthquake sequences and aseismic slip. Zhu W; Allison KL; Dunham EM; Yang Y Nat Commun; 2020 Sep; 11(1):4833. PubMed ID: 32973184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluid-injection-induced earthquakes characterized by hybrid-frequency waveforms manifest the transition from aseismic to seismic slip. Yu H; Harrington RM; Kao H; Liu Y; Wang B Nat Commun; 2021 Nov; 12(1):6862. PubMed ID: 34824197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Energy of injection-induced seismicity predicted from in-situ experiments. De Barros L; Cappa F; Guglielmi Y; Duboeuf L; Grasso JR Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4999. PubMed ID: 30899030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Projecting seismicity induced by complex alterations of underground stresses with applications to geothermal systems. Cacace M; Hofmann H; Shapiro SA Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23560. PubMed ID: 34876611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discriminating between natural and anthropogenic earthquakes: insights from the Emilia Romagna (Italy) 2012 seismic sequence. Albano M; Barba S; Tarabusi G; Saroli M; Stramondo S Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7(1):282. PubMed ID: 28325937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maturity of nearby faults influences seismic hazard from hydraulic fracturing. Kozłowska M; Brudzinski MR; Friberg P; Skoumal RJ; Baxter ND; Currie BS Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(8):E1720-E1729. PubMed ID: 29432169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aseismic transient slip on the Gofar transform fault, East Pacific Rise. Liu Y; McGuire JJ; Behn MD Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 May; 117(19):10188-10194. PubMed ID: 32345716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical investigation of the effect of fluid pressurization rate on laboratory-scale injection-induced fault slip. Hutka GA; Cacace M; Hofmann H; Zang A; Wang L; Ji Y Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4437. PubMed ID: 36932087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induced seismicity provides insight into why earthquake ruptures stop. Galis M; Ampuero JP; Mai PM; Cappa F Sci Adv; 2017 Dec; 3(12):eaap7528. PubMed ID: 29291250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic rupture initiation and propagation in a fluid-injection laboratory setup with diagnostics across multiple temporal scales. Gori M; Rubino V; Rosakis AJ; Lapusta N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(51):. PubMed ID: 34916283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cascading elastic perturbation in Japan due to the 2012 M w 8.6 Indian Ocean earthquake. Delorey AA; Chao K; Obara K; Johnson PA Sci Adv; 2015 Oct; 1(9):e1500468. PubMed ID: 26601289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]