185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32549634)
1. The Use of NFP When Pregnancy Is Contraindicated?
Aznar J; Tudela J
Linacre Q; 2020 May; 87(2):171-181. PubMed ID: 32549634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Natural family planning: a review.
Klaus H
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1982 Feb; 37(2):128-50. PubMed ID: 7033851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Natural family planning in 1985: a status report.
Spieler J; Shuler A
Popul Today; 1985 May; 13(5):3, 9. PubMed ID: 12280130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Natural family planning": effective birth control supported by the Catholic Church.
Ryder RE
BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):723-6. PubMed ID: 8401097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What nurses should know about natural family planning.
Trent AJ; Clark K
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1997; 26(6):643-8. PubMed ID: 9395972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NFP offers user-control, but requires discipline. Contraceptive update.
Barnett B
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1996; 17(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 12320444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Natural family planning.
Davis MS
NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(2):280-90. PubMed ID: 1596436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Natural family planning: folly or fulfillment?
Shivanandan M
Marriage Fam Living; 1976 Oct; 58(10):2-5. PubMed ID: 12339514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural family planning in the 1990s.
Ryder B; Campbell H
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):233-4. PubMed ID: 7503859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epidemiological studies of natural family planning.
Gray RH; Kambic RT
Hum Reprod; 1988 Jul; 3(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 3170708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More about natural family planning.
Gallagher J
Aust Fam Physician; 1983 Nov; 12(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 6667188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring of ovarian activity by measurement of urinary excretion rates using the Ovarian Monitor, Part IV: the relationship of the pregnanediol glucuronide threshold to basal body temperature and cervical mucus as markers for the beginning of the post-ovulatory infertile period.
Blackwell LF; Vigil P; Alliende ME; Brown S; Festin M; Cooke DG
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 26677961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural methods of family planning.
Flynn AM
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Dec; 11(3):661-78. PubMed ID: 6509855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The risks of the natural family planning methods].
Zufferey MM
Ther Umsch; 1986 May; 43(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 3726778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Natural family planning: looking ahead.
Queenan JT; Moghissi KS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):1979-80. PubMed ID: 1755451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Terminology and core curricula in natural family planning.
Brennan JJ; Klaus H
Fertil Steril; 1982 Jul; 38(1):117-8. PubMed ID: 7095160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A second look at natural family planning.
Lolarga E
Initiatives Popul; 1983; 7(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 12265791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Natural family planning.
Lanctot CA
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Apr; 6(1):109-27. PubMed ID: 383345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ovulation method of natural family planning.
Connell-Tatum EB
Fertil Steril; 1981 Nov; 36(5):551-2. PubMed ID: 7308500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989-1992): interim results. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups.
Adv Contracept; 1993 Dec; 9(4):269-83. PubMed ID: 8147240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]