These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32551778)

  • 1. A dynamic model of deciding not to choose.
    Reynolds A; Garton R; Kvam P; Sauer J; Osth AF; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jan; 150(1):42-66. PubMed ID: 32551778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioural pattern separation is strongly associated with familiarity-based decisions.
    Szőllősi Á; Bencze D; Racsmány M
    Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):337-347. PubMed ID: 31955670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How target-lure similarity shapes confidence judgments in multiple-alternative decision tasks.
    Horry R; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1615-1634. PubMed ID: 27736136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing recollection and nonrecollection memory states for recall of general knowledge: A nontrivial pursuit.
    Pereverseff RS; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2207-2225. PubMed ID: 32658545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Independent recollection/familiarity ratings can dissociate: Evidence from the effects of test context on recognition of event details.
    Willems S; Schroyen S; Dehon H; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30802076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.
    Gettleman JN; Grabman JH; Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Mar; 47(3):402-421. PubMed ID: 33030941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic sources of evidence supporting confidence judgments and error detection.
    Charles L; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 30489097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition, remember-know, and confidence judgments: no evidence of cross-contamination here!
    Williams HL; Bodner GE; Lindsay DS
    Memory; 2023 Aug; 31(7):905-917. PubMed ID: 37165509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical note: Exploring Luce's (1963) low-threshold model applied to recognition memory.
    McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 31192679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval dynamics of recognition and rejection.
    Papesh MH; Hicks JL; Guevara Pinto JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2328-2341. PubMed ID: 30808272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident: a large-scale fMRI study.
    Molenberghs P; Trautwein FM; Böckler A; Singer T; Kanske P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 11(12):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 27445213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions.
    Rae B; Heathcote A; Donkin C; Averell L; Brown S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1226-43. PubMed ID: 24797438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 2. Confidence analysis.
    Yi Y; Wang W; Merfeld DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):904-921. PubMed ID: 31215314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent recollection-familiarity ratings: Similar effects of levels-of-processing whether amount or confidence is rated.
    Williams HL; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):94-99. PubMed ID: 30802078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Source retrieval under cueing: Dissociated effects on accuracy versus confidence.
    Jaeger A; Queiroz MC; Selmeczy D; Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1477-1493. PubMed ID: 32105146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forming global estimates of self-performance from local confidence.
    Rouault M; Dayan P; Fleming SM
    Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1141. PubMed ID: 30850612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Varieties of recollective experience.
    Kihlstrom JF
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107295. PubMed ID: 31811844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ignoring memory hints: The stubborn influence of environmental cues on recognition memory.
    Selmeczy D; Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1448-1469. PubMed ID: 28252990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.