These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32552116)

  • 1. On the Cost of Detection Response Task Performance on Cognitive Load.
    Biondi FN; Balasingam B; Ayare P
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):804-812. PubMed ID: 32552116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of auditory detection response task method for assessing the attentional effects of cognitive load.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 29461865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Broader Application of the Detection Response Task to Cognitive Tasks and Online Environments.
    Innes RJ; Evans NJ; Howard ZL; Eidels A; Brown SD
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):896-909. PubMed ID: 32749155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overloaded and at Work: Investigating the Effect of Cognitive Workload on Assembly Task Performance.
    Biondi FN; Cacanindin A; Douglas C; Cort J
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):813-820. PubMed ID: 32530759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring driver distraction - Evaluation of the box task method as a tool for assessing in-vehicle system demand.
    Morgenstern T; Wögerbauer EM; Naujoks F; Krems JF; Keinath A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103181. PubMed ID: 32678787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the selection of stimulus for the auditory variant of the detection response task method for driving experiments.
    Stojmenova K; Policardi F; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28594238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural and psychophysiological correlates of human performance under stress and high mental workload.
    Mandrick K; Peysakhovich V; Rémy F; Lepron E; Causse M
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):62-73. PubMed ID: 27725244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Increased Visual Information on Cognitive Workload in a Helicopter Simulator.
    Innes RJ; Howard ZL; Thorpe A; Eidels A; Brown SD
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):788-803. PubMed ID: 32783536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of concurrent cognitive load measures during n-back tasks.
    Pillai P; Balasingam B; Jaekel A; Biondi FN
    Appl Ergon; 2024 May; 117():104244. PubMed ID: 38320387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of the suitability of a low-cost eye tracker for assessing the cognitive load of drivers.
    Čegovnik T; Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():1-11. PubMed ID: 29409621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver.
    Tillman G; Strayer D; Eidels A; Heathcote A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1795-1803. PubMed ID: 28537009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of baseline pupillary response and task-evoked pupillary response during constant and incremental task load.
    Mosaly PR; Mazur LM; Marks LB
    Ergonomics; 2017 Oct; 60(10):1369-1375. PubMed ID: 28140793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distracted worker: Using pupil size and blink rate to detect cognitive load during manufacturing tasks.
    Biondi FN; Saberi B; Graf F; Cort J; Pillai P; Balasingam B
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103867. PubMed ID: 35970108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adopting Stimulus Detection Tasks for Cognitive Workload Assessment: Some Considerations.
    Biondi FN
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jan; ():187208241228049. PubMed ID: 38247319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of motor task precision on pupil diameter.
    Fletcher K; Neal A; Yeo G
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():309-315. PubMed ID: 28802450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive Load and Situation Awareness for Soldiers: Effects of Message Presentation Rate and Sensory Modality.
    Hollands JG; Spivak T; Kramkowski EW
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):763-773. PubMed ID: 30768371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of luminance on tonic and phasic pupillary responses to sustained cognitive load.
    Peysakhovich V; Vachon F; Dehais F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Feb; 112():40-45. PubMed ID: 27979740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of physiological responses to mental workload in n-back and arithmetic tasks.
    Wiediartini ; Ciptomulyono U; Dewi RS
    Ergonomics; 2024 Aug; 67(8):1121-1133. PubMed ID: 37970874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiological Parameter Response to Variation of Mental Workload.
    Marinescu AC; Sharples S; Ritchie AC; Sánchez López T; McDowell M; Morvan HP
    Hum Factors; 2018 Feb; 60(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 28965433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.