246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32552678)
21. Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.
Nakata N; Ohta T; Nishioka M; Takeyama H; Toriumi Y; Kato K; Nogi H; Kamio M; Fukuda K
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1969-76. PubMed ID: 26384607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The clinical value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging.
Guo W; Li F; Jia C; Wang T; Zhang X; Yao G; Shi X; Bai M
Br J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 95(1136):20220025. PubMed ID: 35604699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast lesions of BI-RADS 4].
Liang YC; Jia CM; Xue Y; Lü Q; Chen F; Wang JJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 May; 98(19):1498-1502. PubMed ID: 29804418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study.
Neuschler EI; Lavin PT; Tucker FL; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Dogan BE; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Young CA; Butler R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 29975115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of breast lesions by contrast enhanced ultrasound: qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Wan C; Du J; Fang H; Li F; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e444-50. PubMed ID: 21612882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pitfalls of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in determination of breast tumor biological dignity.
Lehotska V; Rauova K; Vanovcanova L
Neoplasma; 2018; 65(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 29322796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. ShearWave™ Elastography BE1 multinational breast study: additional SWE™ features support potential to downgrade BI-RADS®-3 lesions.
Schäfer FK; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Hahne U; Madjar H; Svensson WE; Balu-Maestro C; Juhan V; Athanasiou A; Mundinger A; Order B; Locatelli M; Cosgrove D; Wolf OJ; Henry JP; Moutfi M; Gay JM; Cohen-Bacrie C
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun; 34(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 23709241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Homogeneously enhancing breast lesions on contrast enhanced US: differential diagnosis by conventional and contrast enhanced US findings.
Fujimitsu R; Shimakura M; Urakawa H; Morita A; Shinagawa Y; Sakamoto K; Yoshimitsu K
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 34(7):508-14. PubMed ID: 27142527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions.
Fuchsjaeger MH; Flöry D; Reiner CS; Rudas M; Riedl CC; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):478-85. PubMed ID: 15973141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Role of BI-RADS Ultrasound Subcategories 4A to 4C in Predicting Breast Cancer.
Spinelli Varella MA; Teixeira da Cruz J; Rauber A; Varella IS; Fleck JF; Moreira LF
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 29066139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of pathological complete response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Wan CF; Liu XS; Wang L; Zhang J; Lu JS; Li FH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 103():118-123. PubMed ID: 29803376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of inversion imaging to diagnosis in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses.
Li N; Hou Z; Wang J; Bi Y; Wu X; Zhan Y; Peng M
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Dec; 23(1):206. PubMed ID: 38066441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultrasound Elastography Combined With BI-RADS-US Classification System: Is It Helpful for the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasonography?
Hao SY; Jiang QC; Zhong WJ; Zhao XB; Yao JY; Li LJ; Luo BM; Ou B; Zhi H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Jun; 16(3):e33-41. PubMed ID: 26639065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to conventional ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant solid breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wubulihasimu M; Maimaitusun M; Xu XL; Liu XD; Luo BM
Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):936-943. PubMed ID: 30297035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion MR Imaging: Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Several Markers of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.
Iima M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Onishi N; Kawai M; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):432-441. PubMed ID: 29095673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
