These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32552860)

  • 1. Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia.
    Sykes M; Thomson R; Kolehmainen N; Allan L; Finch T
    Implement Sci; 2020 Jun; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 32552860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opportunities to enhance ward audit: a multi-site qualitative study.
    Sykes M; Thomson R; Kolehmainen N; Allan L; Finch T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Mar; 21(1):226. PubMed ID: 33712006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care.
    Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Peek N; de Keizer NF
    Implement Sci; 2019 Sep; 14(1):90. PubMed ID: 31533841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
    Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
    Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do healthcare providers use national audit data for improvement?
    Antonacci G; Whitney J; Harris M; Reed JE
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Apr; 23(1):393. PubMed ID: 37095495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When is audit and feedback effective in dementia care? A systematic review.
    Sykes MJ; McAnuff J; Kolehmainen N
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2018 Mar; 79():27-35. PubMed ID: 29128686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Barriers to Audit-and-Feedback Programs That Used Direct Observation of Hand Hygiene Compliance: A Qualitative Study.
    Livorsi DJ; Goedken CC; Sauder M; Vander Weg MW; Perencevich EN; Reisinger HS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Oct; 1(6):e183344. PubMed ID: 30646239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First-line managers' experience of the use of audit and feedback cycle in specialist mental health care: A qualitative case study.
    Pedersen MS; Landheim A; Møller M; Lien L
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2019 Dec; 33(6):103-109. PubMed ID: 31753214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National neonatal data to support specialist care and improve infant outcomes.
    Spencer A; Modi N
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2013 Mar; 98(2):F175-80. PubMed ID: 22215802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving dementia care: insights from audit and feedback in interdisciplinary primary care sites.
    Arsenault-Lapierre G; Le Berre M; Rojas-Rozo L; McAiney C; Ingram J; Lee L; Vedel I
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Mar; 22(1):353. PubMed ID: 35300660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical audit and the purchaser-provider interaction: different attitudes and expectations in the United Kingdom.
    Thomson R; Elcoat C; Pugh E
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 5(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10158598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A commentary on the quality improvement practices in leading an organizational response to audit feedback.
    Sykes M
    JBI Evid Implement; 2022 Sep; 20(3):166-171. PubMed ID: 36373355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing national audit through addressing the quality improvement capabilities of feedback recipients: a multi-phase intervention development study.
    Sykes M; O'Halloran E; Mahon L; McSharry J; Allan L; Thomson R; Finch T; Kolehmainen N
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2022 Jul; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 35804468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model depicting aspects of audit and feedback that impact physicians' acceptance of clinical performance feedback.
    Payne VL; Hysong SJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():260. PubMed ID: 27412170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The external review of quality improvement in health care organizations: a qualitative study.
    Walshe K; Wallace L; Freeman T; Latham L; Spurgeon P
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2001 Oct; 13(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 11669564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How is feedback from national clinical audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads.
    Taylor A; Neuburger J; Walker K; Cromwell D; Groene O
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2016 Apr; 21(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 26811374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysing organisational context: case studies on the contribution of absorptive capacity theory to understanding inter-organisational variation in performance improvement.
    Harvey G; Jas P; Walshe K
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Jan; 24(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 25336092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation.
    Alvarado N; McVey L; Greenhalgh J; Dowding D; Mamas M; Gale C; Doherty P; Randell R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):859. PubMed ID: 32917202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A qualitative study of the cultural changes in primary care organisations needed to implement clinical governance.
    Marshall M; Sheaff R; Rogers A; Campbell S; Halliwell S; Pickard S; Sibbald B; Roland M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2002 Aug; 52(481):641-5. PubMed ID: 12171222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement without management: qualitative evaluation of a voluntary audit & feedback intervention for primary care teams.
    Wagner DJ; Durbin J; Barnsley J; Ivers NM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 19(1):419. PubMed ID: 31234916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.