119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32553281)
1. Prostate Volume Estimation on MRI: Accuracy and Effects of Ellipsoid and Bullet-Shaped Measurements on PSA Density.
Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Di Fiore GA; Picchi SG; Di Stasi M; Verde F; Petretta M; Imbriaco M; Cuocolo R
Acad Radiol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):e219-e226. PubMed ID: 32553281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which measurement method should be used for prostate volume for PI-RADS? A comparison of ellipsoid and segmentation methods.
Colvin R; Walker D; Hafron J; Seifman B; Nandalur S; Gangwish D; Nandalur KR
Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():454-458. PubMed ID: 34562834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate volume prediction on MRI: tools, accuracy and variability.
Hamzaoui D; Montagne S; Granger B; Allera A; Ezziane M; Luzurier A; Quint R; Kalai M; Ayache N; Delingette H; Renard-Penna R
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4931-4941. PubMed ID: 35169895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume.
Ghafoor S; Becker AS; Woo S; Causa Andrieu PI; Stocker D; Gangai N; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1548-1556. PubMed ID: 32814644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of PSA-density of the transition zone and whole gland for risk stratification of men with suspected prostate cancer: A retrospective MRI-cohort study.
Schneider AF; Stocker D; Hötker AM; Eberli D; Rupp NJ; Donati OF; Becker AS
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108660. PubMed ID: 31546123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The clinical decision-making value of prostate specific antigen and its derived indicators in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 3 lesions].
Yang S; Zhang YY; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Chen T; Li MJ; Tan SX; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):997-1001. PubMed ID: 32294856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of the prostate central gland and total gland volume ratio in the diagnosis of prostate cancer patients in the prostate specific antigen grey zone.
Guo ZF; Yang F; Lu XW; Wu JW; He C; Han CH
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jul; 49(7):3000605211019879. PubMed ID: 34308690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound-derived prostate specific antigen (PSA) density and clinical utility compared to MRI prostate volumes: A feasibility study.
Pantelidou M; Caglic I; George A; Blyuss O; Gnanapragasam VJ; Barrett T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274014. PubMed ID: 36084119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Prostate Volume and Prostate-specific Antigen Density With the Segmentation Method on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Lin YT; Hung SW; Chiu KY; Chai JW; Lin JC
In Vivo; 2023; 37(2):786-793. PubMed ID: 36881046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate-specific antigen density of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Hoshii T; Nishiyama T; Toyabe S; Akazawa K; Komatsu S; Kaneko M; Hara N; Takahashi K
Int J Urol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 17470159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimated Prostate Volume by Semiautomatic Segmentation of MRI Is More Accurately Correlated with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight than the Volume Calculated by Ellipsoid Formula.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Lin SX; Kim MM; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Wu CL; Dahl DM
Urol Int; 2024; 108(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 37995664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of MRI-based PSA density in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy outcomes.
MacAskill F; Lee SM; Eldred-Evans D; Wulaningsih W; Popert R; Wolfe K; Van Hemelrijck M; Rottenberg G; Liyanage SH; Acher P
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Aug; 49(8):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 28477301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Retrospective evaluation of PSA density for selection of biopsy candidates with prostate specific antigen in the gray zone].
Tochigi T; Kawamura S; Numahata K; Tokuyama S; Kuwahara M; Horaguchi T; Satou S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Sep; 92(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 11593702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined Analysis of Biparametric MRI and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: Role in the Prebiopsy Diagnosis of Gleason Score 7 or Greater Prostate Cancer.
Lee SJ; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W166-W172. PubMed ID: 30016148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing prostate cancer accumulating model: combined PI-RADS v2 with prostate specific antigen and its derivative data.
Lu YF; Zhang Q; Yao WG; Chen HY; Chen JY; Xu CC; Yu RS
Cancer Imaging; 2019 May; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 31122297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
