202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32554752)
1. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model definition for genetic evaluation of purebred and crossbred lambs including heterosis.
Vargas Jurado N; Notter DR; Taylor JB; Brown DJ; Mousel MR; Lewis RM
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jun; 100(6):. PubMed ID: 35696612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal definition of contemporary groups for crossbred pigs in a joint purebred and crossbred genetic evaluation.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DA; Chen CY; Valente BD; Holl J; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33313883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.
Srihi H; Noguera JL; Topayan V; Martín de Hijas M; Ibañez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Vázquez-Gómez M; Martínez-Castillero M; Rosas JP; Varona L
Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementing a genomic rotational crossbreeding scheme to promote local dairy cattle breeds-A simulation study.
Stock J; Esfandyari H; Hinrichs D; Bennewitz J
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):6873-6884. PubMed ID: 33773793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig.
Xiang T; Nielsen B; Su G; Legarra A; Christensen OF
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):936-48. PubMed ID: 27065256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding.
Christensen OF; Legarra A; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():98. PubMed ID: 26694257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breed of origin of alleles and genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cows.
Eiríksson JH; Karaman E; Su G; Christensen OF
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Nov; 53(1):84. PubMed ID: 34742238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
