150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32555664)
21. Consent for participating in clinical trials - Is it really informed?
Alexa-Stratulat T; Neagu M; Neagu AI; Alexa ID; Ioan BG
Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Sep; 18(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 29933502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.
Robinson EJ; Kerr CE; Stevens AJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Edwards SJ; Beck SR; Rowley MG
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(8):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Patient Partner Perspectives Regarding Ethically and Clinically Important Aspects of Trial Design in Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials for Hemodialysis.
Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Goldstein CE; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Zwarenstein M; Dixon S; Grimshaw JM; Garg AX; Taljaard M
Can J Kidney Health Dis; 2021; 8():20543581211032818. PubMed ID: 34367647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A survey of study participants' understanding of informed consent to participate in a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture.
Smith CA; Fogarty S
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2016 Jan; 16():10. PubMed ID: 26753767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Process for obtaining informed consent: women's opinions.
Bento SF; Hardy E; Osis MJ
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 19046257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Trusting relationships between patients with non-curative cancer and healthcare professionals create ethical obstacles for informed consent in clinical trials: a grounded theory study.
Murphy M; McCaughan E; Thompson G; Carson MA; Hanna JR; Donovan M; Wilson RH; Fitzsimons D
BMC Palliat Care; 2023 Jul; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 37393250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Preserving consent-for-consent with feasibility-assessment and recruitment in clinical studies: FARSITE architecture.
Ainsworth J; Buchan I
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 147():137-48. PubMed ID: 19593052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic lavage in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a mixed methods study of the feasibility of conducting a surgical placebo-controlled trial (the KORAL study).
Campbell MK; Skea ZC; Sutherland AG; Cuthbertson BH; Entwistle VA; McDonald AM; Norrie JD; Carlson RV; Bridgman S;
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jan; 14(5):1-180. PubMed ID: 20113674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative aspects of informed consent: considering the dose response curve when estimating quantity of information.
Lynöe N; Hoeyer K
J Med Ethics; 2005 Dec; 31(12):736-8. PubMed ID: 16319241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Supporting positive experiences and sustained participation in clinical trials: looking beyond information provision.
Gillies K; Entwistle VA
J Med Ethics; 2012 Dec; 38(12):751-6. PubMed ID: 22875981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Attitudes, understanding, and concerns regarding medical research amongst Egyptians: a qualitative pilot study.
Khalil SS; Silverman HJ; Raafat M; El-Kamary S; El-Setouhy M
BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Aug; 8():9. PubMed ID: 17727728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identifying components in consent information needed to support informed decision making about trial participation: An interview study with women managing cancer.
Abhyankar P; Velikova G; Summers B; Bekker HL
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Jul; 161():83-91. PubMed ID: 27261532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants.
Houghton G; Kingdon C; Dower M; Shakur-Still H; Alfirevic Z
BJOG; 2018 Dec; 125(13):1744-1753. PubMed ID: 29911309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Participant views and experiences of participating in HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review.
Nalubega S; Evans C
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jun; 13(5):330-420. PubMed ID: 26455613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Behavioral and social science research to support development of educational materials for clinical trials of broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV treatment and prevention.
Valente PK; Wu Y; Cohen YZ; Caskey M; Meyers K
Clin Trials; 2021 Feb; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 32838558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gatekeeping in cancer clinical trials in Canada: The ethics of recruiting the "ideal" patient.
Bell JAH; Kelly MT; Gelmon K; Chi K; Ho A; Rodney P; Balneaves LG
Cancer Med; 2020 Jun; 9(12):4107-4113. PubMed ID: 32314549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The ethics of clinical trials for cancer therapy.
Howie LJ; Peppercorn JM
N C Med J; 2014; 75(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 25046093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Could the decision of trial participation precede the informed consent process? Evidence from Burkina Faso.
Paré Toe L; Ravinetto RM; Dierickx S; Gryseels C; Tinto H; Rouamba N; Diallo I; Cissao Y; Bayala K; Hausmann S; Muela J; D'Alessandro U; Peeters Grietens K
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80800. PubMed ID: 24260484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development and evaluation of decision aids for people considering taking part in a clinical trial: a conceptual framework.
Gillies K; Campbell MK
Trials; 2019 Jul; 20(1):401. PubMed ID: 31277693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]