These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques. Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FSE T2-weighted two-point Dixon technique for fat suppression in the lumbar spine: comparison with SPAIR technique. Lee S; Choi DS; Shin HS; Baek HJ; Choi HC; Park SE Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):175-180. PubMed ID: 29770772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fat-suppressed MR Imaging of the Spine for Metal Artifact Reduction at 3T: Comparison of STIR and Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction Fat-suppressed T Lee YH; Hahn S; Kim E; Suh JS Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 15(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 26902679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved contrast for myeloma focal lesions with T2-weighted Dixon images compared to T1-weighted images. Danner A; Brumpt E; Alilet M; Tio G; Omoumi P; Aubry S Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Sep; 100(9):513-519. PubMed ID: 31130374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Value of the T2-Weighted Multipoint Dixon Sequence in MRI of Sacroiliac Joints for the Diagnosis of Active and Chronic Sacroiliitis. Özgen A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Mar; 208(3):603-608. PubMed ID: 28004967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is fat suppression in T1 and T2 FSE with mDixon superior to the frequency selection-based SPAIR technique in musculoskeletal tumor imaging? Huijgen WHF; van Rijswijk CSP; Bloem JL Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 31154494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduced metallic artefacts in 3 T knee MRI using fast spin-echo multi-point Dixon compared to fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences. Park HJ; Lee SY; Choi SH; Hong HP; Choi YJ; Kim MS Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):996.e1-996.e6. PubMed ID: 28807564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging of the pelvis with a dual-echo Dixon technique: initial clinical experience. Beddy P; Rangarajan RD; Kataoka M; Moyle P; Graves MJ; Sala E Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 21079201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole-body MRI in children and adolescents: Can T2-weighted Dixon fat-only images replace standard T1-weighted images in the assessment of bone marrow? Tanturri de Horatio L; Zadig PK; von Brandis E; Ording Müller LS; Rosendahl K; Avenarius DFM Eur J Radiol; 2023 Sep; 166():110968. PubMed ID: 37478654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing T1-weighted and T2-weighted three-point Dixon technique with conventional T1-weighted fat-saturation and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) techniques for the study of the lumbar spine in a short-bore MRI machine. Brandão S; Seixas D; Ayres-Basto M; Castro S; Neto J; Martins C; Ferreira JC; Parada F Clin Radiol; 2013 Nov; 68(11):e617-23. PubMed ID: 23932678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow. van Vucht N; Santiago R; Lottmann B; Pressney I; Harder D; Sheikh A; Saifuddin A Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1861-1874. PubMed ID: 31309243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fat suppression at three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique. Kirchgesner T; Perlepe V; Michoux N; Larbi A; Vande Berg B Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Jan; 99(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 29054404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI. Shigenaga Y; Takenaka D; Hashimoto T; Ishida T Magn Reson Med Sci; 2021 Mar; 20(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 32269186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-shot RARE with Dixon: Application to robust abdominal imaging with uniform fat and water separation at 3T. Wang X; Udayakumar D; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Pedrosa I; Madhuranthakam AJ Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1463-1471. PubMed ID: 33929055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of modified two-point dixon and chemical shift encoded MRI water-fat separation methods for fetal fat quantification. Giza SA; Miller MR; Parthasarathy P; de Vrijer B; McKenzie CA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jul; 48(1):274-282. PubMed ID: 29319918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. American College of Radiology-Compliant Short Protocol Breast MRI for High-Risk Breast Cancer Screening: A Prospective Feasibility Study. Dogan BE; Scoggins ME; Son JB; Wei W; Candelaria R; Yang WT; Ma J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):214-221. PubMed ID: 29091003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T. Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 24925839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast three-point dixon MR imaging using low-resolution images for phase correction: a comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression for pediatric musculoskeletal imaging. Rybicki FJ; Chung T; Reid J; Jaramillo D; Mulkern RV; Ma J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 11641161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]