156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32556745)
1. A Shadow-Test Approach to Adaptive Item Calibration.
van der Linden WJ; Jiang B
Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):301-321. PubMed ID: 32556745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal Bayesian Adaptive Design for Test-Item Calibration.
van der Linden WJ; Ren H
Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):263-88. PubMed ID: 24407735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal Online Calibration Designs for Item Replenishment in Adaptive Testing.
He Y; Chen P
Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 31531789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Continuous Online Item Calibration: Parameter Recovery and Item Utilization.
Ren H; van der Linden WJ; Diao Q
Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):498-522. PubMed ID: 28290109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On-the-fly parameter estimation based on item response theory in item-based adaptive learning systems.
Jiang S; Xiao J; Wang C
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):3260-3280. PubMed ID: 36085544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct Estimation of Diagnostic Classification Model Attribute Mastery Profiles via a Collapsed Gibbs Sampling Algorithm.
Yamaguchi K; Templin J
Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1390-1421. PubMed ID: 35426059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal Item Calibration for Computerized Achievement Tests.
Ul Hassan M; Miller F
Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1101-1128. PubMed ID: 31183669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferring the Number of Attributes for the Exploratory DINA Model.
Chen Y; Liu Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y
Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):30-64. PubMed ID: 33751367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revisiting the 4-Parameter Item Response Model: Bayesian Estimation and Application.
Culpepper SA
Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 26400070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing new online calibration methods for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing.
Chen P; Wang C; Xin T; Chang HH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 28130937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling to item-response theory modeling of multi-symptom genetic data.
Eaves L; Erkanli A; Silberg J; Angold A; Maes HH; Foley D
Behav Genet; 2005 Nov; 35(6):765-80. PubMed ID: 16273316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Gibbs sampler for the multidimensional four-parameter logistic item response model via a data augmentation scheme.
Fu Z; Zhang S; Su YH; Shi N; Tao J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Nov; 74(3):427-464. PubMed ID: 34002857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gradient-free MCMC methods for dynamic causal modelling.
Sengupta B; Friston KJ; Penny WD
Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():375-381. PubMed ID: 25776212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An adaptive Kriging surrogate method for efficient joint estimation of hydraulic and biochemical parameters in reactive transport modeling.
Zhou J; Su X; Cui G
J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Sep; 216():50-57. PubMed ID: 30170768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing.
Han KCT
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():7. PubMed ID: 29575849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gibbs Samplers for Logistic Item Response Models via the Pólya-Gamma Distribution: A Computationally Efficient Data-Augmentation Strategy.
Jiang Z; Templin J
Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):358-374. PubMed ID: 30382548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian semiparametric intensity estimation for inhomogeneous spatial point processes.
Yue YR; Loh JM
Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 21175553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
