BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32556773)

  • 1. Transition from open to minimally invasive en bloc esophagectomy can be achieved without compromising surgical quality.
    Kammili A; Cools-Lartigue J; Mulder D; Feldman LS; Ferri LE; Mueller CL
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3067-3076. PubMed ID: 32556773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
    Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
    Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Versus Open McKeown for Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
    Zheng Y; Li Y; Liu X; Sun H; Shen S; Ba Y; Wang Z; Liu S; Xing W
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):6329-6336. PubMed ID: 33987755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.
    Ising MS; Smith SA; Trivedi JR; Martin RCG; Phillips P; Van Berkel V; Fox MP
    Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 35317621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
    Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Achieving R0.
    Darwish MB; Nagatomo K; Jackson T; Cho E; Osman H; Jeyarajah DR
    JSLS; 2020; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 33414613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.
    Watanabe M; Baba Y; Nagai Y; Baba H
    Surg Today; 2013 Mar; 43(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 22926551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of oncological resection criteria in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Faermark N; Fuks D; Nassar A; Ferraz JM; Lamer C; Lefevre M; Gayet B; Bonnet S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3940-3946. PubMed ID: 34494148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.