200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32557747)
1. A biological effect-guided optimization approach using beam distal-edge avoidance for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3816-3825. PubMed ID: 32557747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization.
Cao W; Khabazian A; Yepes PP; Lim G; Poenisch F; Grosshans DR; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015013. PubMed ID: 29131808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating variable RBE in IMPT optimization for ependymoma.
Goudarzi HM; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14207. PubMed ID: 37985962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Per-voxel constraints to minimize hot spots in linear energy transfer-guided robust optimization for base of skull head and neck cancer patients in IMPT.
Feng H; Shan J; Anderson JD; Wong WW; Schild SE; Foote RL; Patrick CL; Tinnon KB; Fatyga M; Bues M; Patel SH; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):632-647. PubMed ID: 34843119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 32542711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025004. PubMed ID: 30523932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.
An Y; Shan J; Patel SH; Wong W; Schild SE; Ding X; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6138-6147. PubMed ID: 28976574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.
Unkelbach J; Botas P; Giantsoudi D; Gorissen BL; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Dec; 96(5):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 27869082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can differences in linear energy transfer and thus relative biological effectiveness compromise the dosimetric advantage of intensity-modulated proton therapy as compared to passively scattered proton therapy?
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald S; Paganetti H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 29726722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interlaced proton grid therapy - Linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness distributions.
Henry T; Ödén J
Phys Med; 2018 Dec; 56():81-89. PubMed ID: 30473384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.
Wei S; Lin H; Shi C; Xiong W; Chen CC; Huang S; Press RH; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Choi JI; Simone CB; Kang M
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6560-6574. PubMed ID: 35929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.
Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Craft D; Niemierko A; Trofimov A; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23790771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intensity modulated proton arc therapy via geometry-based energy selection for ependymoma.
Cao W; Li Y; Zhang X; Poenisch F; Yepes P; Sahoo N; Grosshans D; McGovern S; Gunn GB; Frank SJ; Zhu XR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13954. PubMed ID: 36913484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Multiple Beams on Plan Quality, Linear Energy Transfer Distribution, and Plan Robustness of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Chen Z; Wang X; Yuan C; Jin X; Liu C
ACS Sens; 2021 Feb; 6(2):408-417. PubMed ID: 33125211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.
Hahn C; Heuchel L; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Plaude S; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 36273132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variations in linear energy transfer within clinical proton therapy fields and the potential for biological treatment planning.
Grassberger C; Trofimov A; Lomax A; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1559-66. PubMed ID: 21163588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
