These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32557848)

  • 1. Graphical approaches for the control of generalized error rates.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(23):3135-3155. PubMed ID: 32557848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors.
    Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence.
    Guo W; Romano J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article3. PubMed ID: 17402918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On generalized fixed sequence procedures for controlling the FWER.
    Qiu Z; Guo W; Lynch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):3968-83. PubMed ID: 26228241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlling type I error rates in multi-arm clinical trials: A case for the false discovery rate.
    Wason JMS; Robertson DS
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Jan; 20(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 32790026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online control of the familywise error rate.
    Tian J; Ramdas A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):976-993. PubMed ID: 33413033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying the generalized partitioning principle to control the generalized familywise error rate.
    Xu H; Hsu J
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):52-67. PubMed ID: 17342949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Type-II generalized family-wise error rate formulas with application to sample size determination.
    Delorme P; de Micheaux PL; Liquet B; Riou J
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(16):2687-714. PubMed ID: 26914402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exhaustive ADDIS principle for online FWER control.
    Fischer L; Roig MB; Brannath W
    Biom J; 2024 Apr; 66(3):e2300237. PubMed ID: 38637319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
    Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Type I error rates of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials: strong control and impact of intermediate outcomes.
    Bratton DJ; Parmar MK; Phillips PP; Choodari-Oskooei B
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17(1):309. PubMed ID: 27369182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal weighted Bonferroni tests and their graphical extensions.
    Xi D; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):475-500. PubMed ID: 38073604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Error, power, and cluster separation rates of pairwise multiple testing procedures.
    Shaffer JP; Kowalchuk RK; Keselman HJ
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 23646989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Rejection Principle for Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Familywise Error Rates.
    Bartroff J; Song J
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Mar; 31(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 26985125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online error rate control for platform trials.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; König F; Posch M; Jaki T
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(14):2475-2495. PubMed ID: 37005003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.