141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32558770)
21. Clinical Application of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Uterine Cervical Cancer.
Liu Y; Ye Z; Sun H; Bai R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1073-8. PubMed ID: 25966933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating between the benign and malignant sinonasal lesions.
Jiang JX; Tang ZH; Zhong YF; Qiang JW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 27758016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diffusional kurtosis imaging in head and neck cancer: On the use of trace-weighted images to estimate indices of non-Gaussian water diffusion.
Marzi S; Minosse S; Vidiri A; Piludu F; Giannelli M
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5411-5419. PubMed ID: 30317646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with diffusion kurtosis imaging: correlation between diffusion kurtosis parameters and tumor cellularity.
Dai Y; Yao Q; Wu G; Wu D; Wu L; Zhu L; Xue R; Xu J
NMR Biomed; 2016 Jul; 29(7):873-81. PubMed ID: 27119793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diffusion volume (DV) measurement in endometrial and cervical cancer: A new MRI parameter in the evaluation of the tumor grading and the risk classification.
Mainenti PP; Pizzuti LM; Segreto S; Comerci M; Fronzo S; Romano F; Crisci V; Smaldone M; Laccetti E; Storto G; Alfano B; Maurea S; Salvatore M; Pace L
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 26724655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiomics analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer: A preliminary study on histological grade evaluation.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Cheng R; Liu S; Qu F; Yin X; Wang Q; Xiao B; Ye Z
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 29761595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Study of Primary Tumor and Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Stage IB1-IIA1 Cervical Cancer.
Zhang X; Dong Y; Song Q; Zhu Y; Pang H; Luo Y; Yu T; Liu F; Guo Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(5):750-758. PubMed ID: 32842062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience.
Kim JK; Kim KA; Park BW; Kim N; Cho KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 18777531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Texture Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps in Cervical Carcinoma: Correlation with Histopathologic Findings and Prognosis.
Yamada I; Oshima N; Miyasaka N; Wakana K; Wakabayashi A; Sakamoto J; Saida Y; Tateishi U; Kobayashi D
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2020 May; 2(3):e190085. PubMed ID: 33778713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative assessment of diffusion kurtosis imaging depicting deep myometrial invasion: a comparative analysis with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Song JC; Lu SS; Zhang J; Liu XS; Luo CY; Chen T
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2020 Mar; 26(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 32071025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB
Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Colorectal carcinoma: Ex vivo evaluation using q-space imaging; Correlation with histopathologic findings.
Yamada I; Hikishima K; Yoshino N; Sakamoto J; Miyasaka N; Yamauchi S; Uetake H; Yasuno M; Saida Y; Tateishi U; Kobayashi D; Eishi Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 48(4):1059-1068. PubMed ID: 29601149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Amide proton transfer weighted combined with diffusion kurtosis imaging for predicting lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer.
Xu Q; Song Q; Wang Y; Lin L; Tian S; Wang N; Wang J; Liu A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Feb; 106():85-90. PubMed ID: 38101652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical application of body diffusion weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis and preoperative N staging of cervical cancer.
Xue HD; Li S; Sun F; Sun HY; Jin ZY; Yang JX; Yu M
Chin Med Sci J; 2008 Sep; 23(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 18853846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Study of Rectal Adenocarcinoma Associated with Histopathologic Prognostic Factors: Preliminary Findings.
Zhu L; Pan Z; Ma Q; Yang W; Shi H; Fu C; Yan X; Du L; Yan F; Zhang H
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 27929929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery.
Qi XX; Shi DF; Ren SX; Zhang SY; Li L; Li QC; Guan LM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 29143940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Application of apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing different sized metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancers.
Zhang A; Song J; Ma Z; Chen T
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jun; 61(6):848-855. PubMed ID: 31615267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of quantitative intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in the preoperative diagnosis of nodal metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma.
Qiu L; Liu XL; Liu SR; Weng ZP; Chen XQ; Feng YZ; Cai XR; Guo CY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1031-9. PubMed ID: 27019309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]