These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32559380)

  • 1. Pair Potentials as Machine Learning Features.
    Pei J; Song LF; Merz KM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Aug; 16(8):5385-5400. PubMed ID: 32559380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FFENCODER-PL: Pair Wise Energy Descriptors for Protein-Ligand Pose Selection.
    Pei J; Song LF; Merz KM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6647-6657. PubMed ID: 34553938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random Forest Refinement of Pairwise Potentials for Protein-Ligand Decoy Detection.
    Pei J; Zheng Z; Kim H; Song LF; Walworth S; Merz MR; Merz KM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jul; 59(7):3305-3315. PubMed ID: 31264420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Random Forest Refinement of the KECSA2 Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein Decoy Detection.
    Pei J; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1919-1929. PubMed ID: 30726079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refinement of pairwise potentials via logistic regression to score protein-protein interactions.
    Tanemura KA; Pei J; Merz KM
    Proteins; 2020 Dec; 88(12):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 32729132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    Biophys J; 2011 Oct; 101(8):2043-52. PubMed ID: 22004759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel nonlinear knowledge-based mean force potentials based on machine learning.
    Dong Q; Zhou S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(2):476-86. PubMed ID: 20820079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HawkRank: a new scoring function for protein-protein docking based on weighted energy terms.
    Feng T; Chen F; Kang Y; Sun H; Liu H; Li D; Zhu F; Hou T
    J Cheminform; 2017 Dec; 9(1):66. PubMed ID: 29282565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking.
    Wroblewska L; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Sep; 28(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 17407093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?
    Korb O; Ten Brink T; Victor Paul Raj FR; Keil M; Exner TE
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Feb; 26(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 22231069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tapping on the Black Box: How Is the Scoring Power of a Machine-Learning Scoring Function Dependent on the Training Set?
    Su M; Feng G; Liu Z; Li Y; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1122-1136. PubMed ID: 32085675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MetaScore: A Novel Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Improve Traditional Scoring Functions for Scoring Protein-Protein Docking Conformations.
    Jung Y; Geng C; Bonvin AMJJ; Xue LC; Honavar VG
    Biomolecules; 2023 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36671507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: Accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all-atom statistical potential and the AMBER force field with the Generalized Born solvation model.
    de Bakker PI; DePristo MA; Burke DF; Blundell TL
    Proteins; 2003 Apr; 51(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 12596261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhou Y
    Protein Sci; 2004 Feb; 13(2):391-9. PubMed ID: 14739324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Protein Sci; 2004 Feb; 13(2):400-11. PubMed ID: 14739325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating Bonded and Nonbonded Potentials in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein Structure Prediction.
    Wang X; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):3080-3090. PubMed ID: 31045366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.