BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32560416)

  • 1. Early Respiratory Impairment and Pneumonia after Hybrid Laparoscopically Assisted Esophagectomy-A Comparison with the Open Approach.
    Reichert M; Lang M; Hecker M; Schneck E; Sander M; Uhle F; Weigand MA; Askevold I; Padberg W; Grau V; Hecker A
    J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32560416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative statin medication impairs pulmonary outcome after abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy.
    Reichert M; Lang M; Pons-Kühnemann J; Sander M; Padberg W; Hecker A
    Perioper Med (Lond); 2022 Sep; 11(1):47. PubMed ID: 36104793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
    Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy patients are particularly vulnerable to respiratory impairment - a comparison to major lung resection.
    Reichert M; Schistek M; Uhle F; Koch C; Bodner J; Hecker M; Hörbelt R; Grau V; Padberg W; Weigand MA; Hecker A
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11856. PubMed ID: 31413282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers.
    Parameswaran R; Titcomb DR; Blencowe NS; Berrisford RG; Wajed SA; Streets CG; Hollowood AD; Krysztopik R; Barham CP; Blazeby JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1970-7. PubMed ID: 23306956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Moon DH; Lee JM; Jeon JH; Yang HC; Kim MS
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Sep; 9(9):3005-3012. PubMed ID: 29221273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
    Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is associated with less-restrictive ventilatory impairment and less risk for pulmonary complication than open laparotomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Oshikiri T; Yasuda T; Kawasaki K; Harada H; Oyama M; Hasegawa H; Ohara T; Sendo H; Nakamura T; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Kakeji Y
    Surgery; 2016 Feb; 159(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 26361833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
    Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.
    Kanekiyo S; Takeda S; Tsutsui M; Nishiyama M; Kitahara M; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Tomochika S; Tokuhisa Y; Iida M; Sakamoto K; Suzuki N; Yamamoto S; Yoshino S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1945-1953. PubMed ID: 29075967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Mariette C; Markar SR; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Pezet D; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrère N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Bonnetain F; Piessen G;
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Jan; 380(2):152-162. PubMed ID: 30625052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Single Intercostal Space Thoracoscopic Approach for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
    Pan S; Wang L; Wu M; Wang Q; Shen G; Chen G
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 28504587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
    Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer - retrospective analysis and comparison with transhiatal resection.
    Jínek T; Adamcik L; Duda M; Skrovina M
    Rozhl Chir; 2018; 97(7):320-327. PubMed ID: 30442013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Mao T; Fang W; Gu Z; Guo X; Ji C; Chen W
    Thorac Cancer; 2015 May; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 26273376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.