198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32560722)
1. Efficacy and clinical outcome of the port-a-cath in children: a tertiary care-center experience.
Bawazir O; Banoon E
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 18(1):134. PubMed ID: 32560722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence and outcome of retained Port-A-Cath fragments during removal.
Aworanti OM; Linnane N; Tareen F; Mortell A
Pediatr Surg Int; 2017 Jul; 33(7):777-781. PubMed ID: 28584903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Replacement Versus Same-Site Salvage Using Hickman Catheter for Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: A Comparative Study.
Bawazir OA; Binyahib SM; Bawazir R; Bawazir A
Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Oct; 76():443-448. PubMed ID: 33905847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complications and Management of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients at a University Hospital in Oman.
D'Souza PC; Kumar S; Kakaria A; Al-Sukaiti R; Al-Baimani K; Hamid RS; Mittal AK; Al-Balushi M; Burney IA; Al-Moundhri MS
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2021 Feb; 21(1):e103-e109. PubMed ID: 33777430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hickman Central Venous Catheters in Children: Open Versus Percutaneous Technique.
Bawazir OA; Altokhais TI
Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68():209-216. PubMed ID: 32428648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early experience with PECS 1 block for Port-a-Cath insertion or removal in children at a single institution.
Munshey F; Ramamurthi RJ; Tsui B
J Clin Anesth; 2018 Sep; 49():63-64. PubMed ID: 29894919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of port-a-cath in cancer patients: a single-center experience.
D'Souza PC; Kumar S; Kakaria A; Al-Sukaiti R; Zahid KF; Furrukh M; Burney IA; Al-Moundhri MS
J Infect Dev Ctries; 2014 Nov; 8(11):1476-82. PubMed ID: 25390061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Port-A-Cath insertions in acute leukemia: does thrombocytopenia affect morbidity?
Loh AH; Chui CH
J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Jul; 42(7):1180-4. PubMed ID: 17618877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Port-a-Cath Insertion in Pediatric Patients With Malignancy in Tabuk.
Ghmaird AS; Mohammad Alnoaiji MS; Alalawi YS; Alrashidi TN; Al Blewi SM; Gad NG; Alshahrani EH
Cureus; 2021 Aug; 13(8):e17379. PubMed ID: 34584789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoluminal Dilation Technique to Remove Stuck Port-A-Cath: A Case Report.
Cerini P; Guzzardi G; Galbiati A; Stanca C; Del Sette B; Carriero A
Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Aug; 43():317.e1-317.e3. PubMed ID: 28495535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections.
Newman N; Issa A; Greenberg D; Kapelushnik J; Cohen Z; Leibovitz E
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2012 Aug; 59(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22535579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk profile of subcutaneous port placement in small children.
Overman RE; Casar Berazaluce AM; Van Arendonk K; Wagner ML; Kartal T; Witte A; Rymeski B; Speck KE
J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Jan; 56(1):183-186. PubMed ID: 33131779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Severe Neutropenia at the Time of Implantable Subcutaneous Chest Port Insertion Is Not a Risk Factor for Port Removal at a Tertiary Pediatric Center.
Hoss DR; Bedros AA; Mesipam A; Criddle J; Smith JC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 28034702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Right- and left-subclavian vein port-a-cath systems: comparison of complications.
Tsai YF; Ku YH; Chen SW; Huang WT; Lu CC; Tsao CJ
Eur Surg Res; 2012; 49(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 22813785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyurethane versus silicone port a cath: What's going on at removal?
Alzahrani K; Lejeune J; Lakhal W; Morel B; Cook AR; Braïk K; Lardy H; Binet A
J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Jul; 53(7):1417-1419. PubMed ID: 28689888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Port first vs. Tip first: does difference in portacath insertion techniques reduce complication rates.
Tang H; Bhutia S
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Jun; 93(6):1532-1535. PubMed ID: 36772890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tunnelled central venous access devices in small children: A comparison of open vs. ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion in children weighing ten kilograms or less.
Vierboom L; Darani A; Langusch C; Soundappan S; Karpelowsky J
J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Sep; 53(9):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 29706443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound guidance for Port-A-Cath insertion in children; a comparative study.
Bawazir OA; Bawazir A
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2021 Sep; 8(3):181-185. PubMed ID: 34350332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Experiences with a modified implantation technique of Port-A-Cath systems as continuous venous access in infants and children].
Erhard J; Lange R; Kremens B; Krause U; Eigler FW
Med Klin (Munich); 1991 Oct; 86(10):512-4. PubMed ID: 1758373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current port maintenance strategies are insufficient: View based on actual presentations of implanted ports.
Chou PL; Fu JY; Cheng CH; Chu Y; Wu CF; Ko PJ; Liu YH; Wu CY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(44):e17757. PubMed ID: 31689833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
