BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32561428)

  • 1. Application of medium-term metrics for assessing glucose homoeostasis: Usefulness, strengths and weaknesses.
    Monnier L; Colette C; Owens D
    Diabetes Metab; 2021 Mar; 47(2):101173. PubMed ID: 32561428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Glycemic Metrics Measured Simultaneously by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Nørgaard SK; Mathiesen ER; Nørgaard K; Ringholm L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2021 Oct; 23(10):665-672. PubMed ID: 34086494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of Glycemic Variability in Well-controlled Type 2 Diabetic Patients Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
    Swami V; Yadav SK; Saxena P; Sharma A; Dash CK; Gupta A
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2024 Jan; 72(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 38736069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Moderator Analyses of the ALERTT1 Trial.
    Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 36172693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glycaemia in low-premixed insulin analogue type 2 diabetes patients in a real-world setting: are the CGM targets met?
    Krajnc M; Kravos Tramšek NA
    Eur J Med Res; 2023 Mar; 28(1):111. PubMed ID: 36882852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jancev M; Vissers TACM; Visseren FLJ; van Bon AC; Serné EH; DeVries JH; de Valk HW; van Sloten TT
    Diabetologia; 2024 May; 67(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 38363342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time In Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Using Treatment Strategies Based on Nonautomated Insulin Delivery Systems in the Real World.
    Cherubini V; Bonfanti R; Casertano A; De Nitto E; Iannilli A; Lombardo F; Maltoni G; Marigliano M; Bassi M; Minuto N; Mozzillo E; Rabbone I; Rapini N; Rigamonti A; Salzano G; Scaramuzza A; Schiaffini R; Tinti D; Toni S; Zagaroli L; Zucchini S; Maffeis C; Gesuita R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Jul; 22(7):509-515. PubMed ID: 32073311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the glycaemic outcomes between real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) among adults and children with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhou Y; Sardana D; Kuroko S; Haszard JJ; de Block MI; Weng J; Jefferies C; Wheeler BJ
    Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15280. PubMed ID: 38197238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Metrics of Glycemic Control in Diabetes: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Maiorino MI; Signoriello S; Maio A; Chiodini P; Bellastella G; Scappaticcio L; Longo M; Giugliano D; Esposito K
    Diabetes Care; 2020 May; 43(5):1146-1156. PubMed ID: 32312858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the inter-subject variability in the relationship between glucose monitoring metrics and glycated hemoglobin for pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Bosoni P; Calcaterra V; Tibollo V; Malovini A; Zuccotti G; Mameli C; Sacchi L; Bellazzi R; Larizza C
    J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2021 May; 34(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 33823102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of divergent continuous glucose monitoring technologies on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Elbalshy M; Haszard J; Smith H; Kuroko S; Galland B; Oliver N; Shah V; de Bock MI; Wheeler BJ
    Diabet Med; 2022 Aug; 39(8):e14854. PubMed ID: 35441743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Reduced Self-Monitored Blood Glucose Testing After Adoption of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hemoglobin A1c and Time in Range.
    Puhr S; Calhoun P; Welsh JB; Walker TC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Aug; 20(8):557-560. PubMed ID: 30036082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous glucose monitoring metrics (Mean Glucose, time above range and time in range) are superior to glycated haemoglobin for assessment of therapeutic efficacy.
    Rodbard D
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2023 Feb; 25(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 36314133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship of continuous glucose monitoring-related metrics with HbA1c and residual β-cell function in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Babaya N; Noso S; Hiromine Y; Taketomo Y; Niwano F; Yoshida S; Yasutake S; Kawabata Y; Ikegami H
    Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):4006. PubMed ID: 33597626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term glycemic control and glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: Determination of optimal sampling duration.
    Piona C; Marigliano M; Mozzillo E; Franzese A; Zanfardino A; Iafusco D; Maltoni G; Zucchini S; Delvecchio M; Maffeis C
    Pediatr Diabetes; 2020 Dec; 21(8):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 32935887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hásková A; Radovnická L; Petruželková L; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Kádě O; Matoulek M; Prázný M; Šoupal J
    Diabetes Care; 2020 Nov; 43(11):2744-2750. PubMed ID: 32859607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individualization of recommendations from the international consensus on continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics in Japanese children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
    Urakami T; Yoshida K; Kuwabara R; Mine Y; Aoki M; Suzuki J; Morioka I
    Endocr J; 2020 Oct; 67(10):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 32565500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of flash glucose monitoring with real time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
    Massa GG; Gys I; Bevilacqua E; Wijnands A; Zeevaert R
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 152():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-world glycaemic outcomes in adult persons with type 1 diabetes using a real-time continuous glucose monitor compared to an intermittently scanned glucose monitor: A retrospective observational study from the Canadian LMC diabetes registry (REAL-CGM-T1D).
    Brown RE; Chu L; Norman GJ; Abitbol A
    Diabet Med; 2022 Nov; 39(11):e14937. PubMed ID: 36065977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of a Switch from Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (isCGM) to Real-Time (rt) CGM in Diabetes Type 1 Suboptimal Controlled Patients in Real-Life: A One-Year Prospective Study
    Préau Y; Galie S; Schaepelynck P; Armand M; Raccah D
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.