These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32562099)

  • 1. Is rod diameter associated with the rate of rod fracture in patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods?
    Roye BD; Marciano G; Matsumoto H; Fields MW; Campbell M; White KK; Sawyer J; Smith JT; Luhmann S; Sturm P; Sponseller P; Vitale MG; ;
    Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1375-1384. PubMed ID: 32562099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Growing rod fractures: risk factors and opportunities for prevention.
    Yang JS; Sponseller PD; Thompson GH; Akbarnia BA; Emans JB; Yazici M; Skaggs DL; Shah SA; Salari P; Poe-Kochert C;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(20):1639-44. PubMed ID: 21738096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Traditional growing rod versus magnetically controlled growing rod for treatment of early onset scoliosis: Cost analysis from implantation till skeletal maturity.
    Wong CKH; Cheung JPY; Cheung PWH; Lam CLK; Cheung KMC
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(2):2309499017705022. PubMed ID: 28481128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single distraction-rod constructs in severe early-onset scoliosis: Indications and outcomes.
    Luhmann SJ; Skaggs DL; Pahys J; Samdani A; El-Hawary R
    Spine J; 2022 Feb; 22(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 34547389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Staged instrumentation with magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: indications and preliminary outcomes.
    Peiro-Garcia A; Bourget-Murray J; Suarez-Lorenzo I; Parsons D; Ferri-de-Barros F
    Spine Deform; 2020 Apr; 8(2):317-325. PubMed ID: 32077086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unplanned Reoperations in Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Surgery for Early Onset Scoliosis With a Minimum of Two-Year Follow-Up.
    Kwan KYH; Alanay A; Yazici M; Demirkiran G; Helenius I; Nnadi C; Ferguson J; Akbarnia BA; Cheung JPY; Cheung KMC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1410-E1414. PubMed ID: 28658035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with a hybrid of a concave magnetic driver (magnetic controlled growth rod) and a contralateral passive sliding rod construct with apical control: preliminary report on 17 cases.
    Skov ST; Wijdicks SPJ; Bünger C; Castelein RM; Li H; Kruyt MC
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 28687252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Decreased Surgical Stress Really Improve the Psychosocial Health of Early-onset Scoliosis Patients?: A Comparison of Traditional Growing Rods and Magnetically-controlled Growing Rods Patients Reveals Disappointing Results.
    Aslan C; Olgun ZD; Ayik G; Karaokur R; Ozusta S; Demirkiran GH; Unal F; Yazici M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E656-E663. PubMed ID: 30475340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health-Related Quality of Life in Early-Onset Scoliosis Patients Treated Surgically: EOSQ Scores in Traditional Growing Rod Versus Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods.
    Doany ME; Olgun ZD; Kinikli GI; Bekmez S; Kocyigit A; Demirkiran G; Karaagaoglu AE; Yazici M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jan; 43(2):148-153. PubMed ID: 28604490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single vs dual rod constructs in early onset scoliosis treated with magnetically controlled growing rods.
    Urbański W; Tucker S; Ember T; Nadarajah R
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1169-1174. PubMed ID: 33064377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Matched Comparison of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods with Traditional Growing Rods in Severe Early-Onset Scoliosis of ≥90°: An Interim Report on Outcomes 2 Years After Treatment.
    Saarinen AJ; Sponseller PD; Andras LM; Skaggs DL; Emans JB; Thompson GH; Helenius IJ;
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Jan; 104(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34644282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant Complications After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for Early Onset Scoliosis: A Multicenter Retrospective Review.
    Choi E; Yaszay B; Mundis G; Hosseini P; Pawelek J; Alanay A; Berk H; Cheung K; Demirkiran G; Ferguson J; Greggi T; Helenius I; La Rosa G; Senkoylu A; Akbarnia BA
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2017 Dec; 37(8):e588-e592. PubMed ID: 27328123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proximal anchor fixation in magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR): preliminary 2-year results of the impact of anchor location and density.
    Meza BC; Shah SA; Vitale MG; Sturm PF; Luhmann SJ; ; Anari JB
    Spine Deform; 2020 Aug; 8(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 32189230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A six-year observational study of 31 children with early-onset scoliosis treated using magnetically controlled growing rods with a minimum follow-up of two years.
    Subramanian T; Ahmad A; Mardare DM; Kieser DC; Mayers D; Nnadi C
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Sep; 100-B(9):1187-1200. PubMed ID: 30168755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review of the complications associated with magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis.
    Thakar C; Kieser DC; Mardare M; Haleem S; Fairbank J; Nnadi C
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2062-2071. PubMed ID: 29675673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Primary and Conversion Magnetically Controlled Growth Rods Are Different at Two-Year Follow-up: Results of North American Release.
    Hung CW; Vitale MG; Samdani A; Matsumoto H; Smith JT; Sturm PF; Sponseller PD; Luhmann SJ; St Hilaire T; El-Hawary R; Sawyer JR
    Spine Deform; 2019 Sep; 7(5):829-835. PubMed ID: 31495485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Magnetic Spinal Growth Rods (MCGR) With and Without Preoperative Halo-gravity Traction (HGT) for the Treatment of Severe Early-onset Scoliosis (EOS).
    Welborn MC; Krajbich JI; D'Amato C
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2019 Apr; 39(4):e293-e297. PubMed ID: 30475319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of magnetically controlled growing rods on three-dimensional changes in deformity correction.
    Cheung JPY; Cheung PWH; Cheung KMC
    Spine Deform; 2020 Jun; 8(3):537-546. PubMed ID: 32072490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintenance of curve correction and unplanned return to the operating room with magnetically controlled growing rods: a cohort of 24 patients with follow-up between 2 and 7 years.
    Marquez-Lara A; Bachman D; Noble M; Preston G; Gilday S; Ihnow S; Jain V; Sturm PF
    Spine Deform; 2023 May; 11(3):715-721. PubMed ID: 36662383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Traditional Growing Rods Versus Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Case-Matched 2-Year Study.
    Akbarnia BA; Pawelek JB; Cheung KM; Demirkiran G; Elsebaie H; Emans JB; Johnston CE; Mundis GM; Noordeen H; Skaggs DL; Sponseller PD; Thompson GH; Yaszay B; Yazici M;
    Spine Deform; 2014 Nov; 2(6):493-497. PubMed ID: 27927412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.