These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32562179)

  • 1. Validity of US measurements of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement parameters: a preliminary study in an asymptomatic adult population.
    Balci S; Karanfil Y; Oguz B; Aydingoz U
    Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 32562179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphologic Features of the Contralateral Femur in Patients With Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Resembles Mild Slip Deformity: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Hesper T; Bixby SD; Maranho DA; Miller P; Kim YJ; Novais EN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr; 476(4):890-899. PubMed ID: 29481345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement by ultrasonography: value of anterior femoral distance measurements.
    Hsu YC; Wu YC; Wang HH; Lee MS; Huang GS
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E158-E165. PubMed ID: 23238801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement by ultrasound.
    Lerch S; Kasperczyk A; Warnecke J; Berndt T; Rühmann O
    Int Orthop; 2013 May; 37(5):783-8. PubMed ID: 23456019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?
    Atkins PR; Shin Y; Agrawal P; Elhabian SY; Whitaker RT; Weiss JA; Aoki SK; Peters CL; Anderson AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):242-253. PubMed ID: 30179924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hip MRI: Prevalence of articular cartilage defects and labral tears in asymptomatic volunteers. A comparison with a matched population of patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
    Tresch F; Dietrich TJ; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):440-451. PubMed ID: 27981665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.
    Mascarenhas VV; Rego P; Dantas P; Castro M; Jans L; Marques RM; Gouveia N; Soldado F; Ayeni OR; Consciência JG
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1609-1624. PubMed ID: 29110047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-Time Assessment of Femoroacetabular Motion Using Radial Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Arthrography at 3 Tesla in Routine Clinical Practice: A Pilot Study.
    Burke CJ; Walter WR; Gyftopoulos S; Pham H; Baron S; Gonzalez-Lomas G; Vigdorchik JM; Youm T
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Aug; 35(8):2366-2374. PubMed ID: 31395172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the alpha angle: Alternative measurements for quantifying cam-type deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.
    Ehrmann C; Rosskopf AB; Pfirrmann CW; Sutter R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1024-31. PubMed ID: 25639986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How Does the dGEMRIC Index Change After Surgical Treatment for FAI? A Prospective Controlled Study: Preliminary Results.
    Schmaranzer F; Haefeli PC; Hanke MS; Liechti EF; Werlen SF; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1080-1099. PubMed ID: 27709422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients With Decreased Femoral Version Have Different Impingement Locations and Intra- and Extraarticular Anterior Subspine FAI on 3D-CT-Based Impingement Simulation: Implications for Hip Arthroscopy.
    Lerch TD; Boschung A; Todorski IAS; Steppacher SD; Schmaranzer F; Zheng G; Ryan MK; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3120-3132. PubMed ID: 31539275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer?
    Lohan DG; Seeger LL; Motamedi K; Hame S; Sayre J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(9):855-62. PubMed ID: 19565238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What MRI Findings Predict Failure 10 Years After Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?
    Hanke MS; Steppacher SD; Anwander H; Werlen S; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1192-1207. PubMed ID: 27580735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?
    Bouma HW; Hogervorst T; Audenaert E; Krekel P; van Kampen PM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1396-403. PubMed ID: 25384428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-Specific 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Dynamic Simulation of Hip Impingement and Range of Motion Can Replace 3-D Computed Tomography-Based Simulation for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Implications for Planning Open Hip Preservation Surgery and Hip Arthroscopy.
    Lerch TD; Degonda C; Schmaranzer F; Todorski I; Cullmann-Bastian J; Zheng G; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 47(12):2966-2977. PubMed ID: 31486679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. T1ρ Hip Cartilage Mapping in Assessing Patients With Cam Morphology: How Can We Optimize the Regions of Interest?
    Anwander H; Rakhra KS; Melkus G; Beaulé PE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1066-1075. PubMed ID: 27506970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the contralateral hip at risk in patients with unilateral symptomatic cam femoroacetabular impingement? A quantitative T1ρ MRI study.
    McGuffin WS; Melkus G; Rakhra KS; Beaulé PE
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2015 Aug; 23(8):1337-42. PubMed ID: 25819578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements.
    Nepple JJ; Martell JM; Kim YJ; Zaltz I; Millis MB; Podeszwa DA; Sucato DJ; Sink EL; Clohisy JC;
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 42(10):2393-401. PubMed ID: 25134816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional assessment of cam engagement in femoroacetabular impingement.
    Audenaert EA; Mahieu P; Pattyn C
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Feb; 27(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 20952150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of alpha angle between various radiographic projections and radial magnetic resonance imaging for cam deformity in femoral head-neck junction.
    Saito M; Tsukada S; Yoshida K; Okada Y; Tasaki A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jan; 25(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 26878850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.