167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32562188)
1. 3-Dimensional objective aesthetic evaluation to replace panel assessment after breast-conserving treatment.
Godden AR; O'Connell RL; Barry PA; Krupa KCD; Wolf LM; Mohammed K; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
Breast Cancer; 2020 Nov; 27(6):1126-1136. PubMed ID: 32562188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The potential role of three-dimensional surface imaging as a tool to evaluate aesthetic outcome after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT).
O'Connell RL; Di Micco R; Khabra K; Wolf L; deSouza N; Roche N; Barry PA; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):385-393. PubMed ID: 28447239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process.
Godden AR; Wood SH; James SE; MacNeill FA; Rusby JE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 32620404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional simulation of aesthetic outcome from breast-conserving surgery compared with viewing photographs or standard care: randomized clinical trial.
Godden AR; Micha A; Wolf LM; Pitches C; Barry PA; Khan AA; Krupa KDC; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
Br J Surg; 2021 Oct; 108(10):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 34370833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aesthetic outcomes in women undergoing breast-conserving therapy followed by mastectomy and microsurgical reconstruction.
Khansa I; Boehmler JH
Microsurgery; 2015 Jan; 35(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 24449018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aesthetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery assessed by three evaluation modalities in relation to health-related quality of life.
Dahlbäck C; Ringberg A; Manjer J
Br J Surg; 2019 Jan; 106(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 30160774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Search of a Gold Standard Scoring System for the Subjective Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Therapy.
Racz JM; Hong NL; Latosinsky S
Breast J; 2015; 21(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 25940058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Satisfaction with the Aesthetic Effect and Quality of Life for Women after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT)-Preliminary Research.
Krzos A; Stanisławek A; Jędrych M; Łuczyk M; Ślusarska B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(23):. PubMed ID: 31775229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™.
Dahlbäck C; Ullmark JH; Rehn M; Ringberg A; Manjer J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):679-687. PubMed ID: 28536951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of 3D images in the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial.
Cardoso MJ; Vrieling C; Cardoso JS; Oliveira HP; Williams NR; Dixon JM; ;
Breast; 2018 Oct; 41():19-24. PubMed ID: 29940498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aesthetic and functional outcome after breast conserving surgery - Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic resection.
Ojala K; Meretoja TJ; Leidenius MH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 28040314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determinants for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving surgery.
Dahlbäck C; Manjer J; Rehn M; Ringberg A
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 14(1):303. PubMed ID: 27923403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical assessment of breast symmetry and aesthetic outcome: can 3D imaging be the gold standard?
Bai L; Lundström O; Johansson H; Meybodi F; Arver B; Sandelin K; Wickman M; Brandberg Y
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2023; 57(1-6):145-152. PubMed ID: 35034560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of cosmetic outcome following breast-conserving therapy in trials: panel versus digitalized analysis and the role of PROMs.
Lagendijk M; Vos EL; Nieboer D; Verhoef C; Corten EML; Koppert LB
Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 29316049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of early poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer: initial results of a prospective cohort study at a single institution.
Foersterling E; Golatta M; Hennigs A; Schulz S; Rauch G; Schott S; Domschke C; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 110(7):801-6. PubMed ID: 25132148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term quality of life and aesthetic outcomes after breast conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer.
Zwakman M; Tan A; Boersma C; Klinkenbijl JHG; Noorda EM; de Jong TR; Francken AB
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1692-1698. PubMed ID: 35241322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposal for a gold standard for cosmetic evaluation after breast conserving therapy: Results from the St George and Wollongong Breast Boost trial.
Merie R; Browne L; Cardoso JS; Cardoso MJ; Chin Y; Clark C; Graham P; Szwajcer A; Hau E
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Dec; 61(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 28834326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction improves patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome for central breast tumours.
Shechter S; Friedman O; Inbal A; Arad E; Menes T; Barsuk D; Gur E; Barnea Y
ANZ J Surg; 2019 May; 89(5):536-540. PubMed ID: 30895710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast surgery for young women with early-stage breast cancer: Mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy?
Sun ZH; Chen C; Kuang XW; Song JL; Sun SR; Wang WX
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(18):e25880. PubMed ID: 33951002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients.
Fedorcik GG; Sachs R; Goldfarb MA
Breast J; 2006; 12(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 16684317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
