147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32563405)
1. Effect of age and secondary task engagement on motor vehicle crashes in a naturalistic setting.
Calvo JA; Baldwin C; Philips B
J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():297-302. PubMed ID: 32563405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.
Guo F; Klauer SG; Fang Y; Hankey JM; Antin JF; Perez MA; Lee SE; Dingus TA
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):258-265. PubMed ID: 28338711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multitasking additional-to-driving: Prevalence, structure, and associated risk in SHRP2 naturalistic driving data.
Bálint A; Flannagan CAC; Leslie A; Klauer S; Guo F; Dozza M
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105455. PubMed ID: 32036106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Near crash characteristics among risky drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Hannan C; Rogers R; Belwadi A; Loeb H
J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():263-269. PubMed ID: 32563402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Creation of the Naturalistic Engagement in Secondary Tasks (NEST) distracted driving dataset.
Owens JM; Angell L; Hankey JM; Foley J; Ebe K
J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():33-6. PubMed ID: 26403898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How are different sources of distraction associated with at-fault crashes among drivers of different age gender groups?
Liang OS; Yang CC
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106505. PubMed ID: 34844081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of crash rates and rear-end striking crashes among novice teens and experienced adults using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study.
Seacrist T; Belwadi A; Prabahar A; Chamberlain S; Megariotis J; Loeb H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():48-52. PubMed ID: 27586102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The driver-level crash risk associated with daily cellphone use and cellphone use while driving.
Atwood J; Guo F; Fitch G; Dingus TA
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():149-154. PubMed ID: 30031295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Driving impairments and duration of distractions: Assessing crash risk by harnessing microscopic naturalistic driving data.
Arvin R; Khattak AJ
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105733. PubMed ID: 32916552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.
Schneidereit T; Petzoldt T; Keinath A; Krems JF
J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():33-42. PubMed ID: 28882275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the causal effects of cellphone distraction on crash risk using propensity score methods.
Lu D; Guo F; Li F
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105579. PubMed ID: 32480016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Teens' distracted driving behavior: Prevalence and predictors.
Gershon P; Zhu C; Klauer SG; Dingus T; Simons-Morton B
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():157-161. PubMed ID: 29203014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
Gao J; Davis GA
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examining teen driver crashes and the prevalence of distraction: Recent trends, 2007-2015.
Carney C; Harland KK; McGehee DV
J Safety Res; 2018 Feb; 64():21-27. PubMed ID: 29636166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Drivers with child passengers: distracted but cautious?
Maasalo I; Lehtonen E; Summala H
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():25-32. PubMed ID: 31233993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using event-triggered naturalistic data to examine the prevalence of teen driver distractions in rear-end crashes.
Carney C; Harland KK; McGehee DV
J Safety Res; 2016 Jun; 57():47-52. PubMed ID: 27178079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distracting behaviors among teenagers and young, middle-aged, and older adult drivers when driving without and with warnings from an integrated vehicle safety system.
Kidd DG; Buonarosa ML
J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():177-185. PubMed ID: 28454863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-related differences in fatal intersection crashes in the United States.
Lombardi DA; Horrey WJ; Courtney TK
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):20-29. PubMed ID: 27855312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
