These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32563838)

  • 1. The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases.
    Samie L; Champod C; Taylor D; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102334. PubMed ID: 32563838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stabbing simulations and DNA transfer.
    Samie L; Hicks T; Castella V; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():73-80. PubMed ID: 26875110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct and Secondary Transfer of Touch DNA on a Credit Card: Evidence Evaluation Given Activity Level Propositions and Application of Bayesian Networks.
    Onofri M; Altomare C; Severini S; Tommolini F; Lancia M; Carlini L; Gambelunghe C; Carnevali E
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Apr; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 37239356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An LR framework incorporating sensitivity analysis to model multiple direct and secondary transfer events on skin surface.
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Roseth A; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102509. PubMed ID: 33930816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
    Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using case specific experiments to evaluate fingermarks on knives given activity level propositions.
    de Ronde A; Kokshoorn B; de Puit M; de Poot CJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110710. PubMed ID: 33561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When evaluating DNA evidence within a likelihood ratio framework, should the propositions be exhaustive?
    Buckleton J; Taylor D; Bright JA; Hicks T; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102406. PubMed ID: 33142191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who Packed the Drugs? Application of Bayesian Networks to Address Questions of DNA Transfer, Persistence, and Recovery from Plastic Bags and Tape.
    Fonneløp AE; Faria S; Shanthan G; Gill P
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activity level DNA evidence evaluation: On propositions addressing the actor or the activity.
    Kokshoorn B; Blankers BJ; de Zoete J; Berger CEH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():115-124. PubMed ID: 28715673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer, persistence and recovery of DNA and mRNA vaginal mucosa markers after intimate and social contact with Bayesian network analysis for activity level reporting.
    Johannessen H; Gill P; Shanthan G; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Sep; 60():102750. PubMed ID: 35914368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of considering common sources of unknown DNA when evaluating findings given activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Volgin L; Kokshoorn B; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102518. PubMed ID: 33865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trace DNA evidence dynamics: An investigation into the deposition and persistence of directly- and indirectly-transferred DNA on regularly-used knives.
    Meakin GE; Butcher EV; van Oorschot RAH; Morgan RM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():38-47. PubMed ID: 28363122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer and persistence of non-self DNA on hands over time: Using empirical data to evaluate DNA evidence given activity level propositions.
    Szkuta B; Ballantyne KN; Kokshoorn B; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():84-97. PubMed ID: 29216581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():136-146. PubMed ID: 29275089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA transfer when using gloves in burglary simulations.
    Carrara L; Hicks T; Samie L; Taroni F; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Mar; 63():102823. PubMed ID: 36563530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structuring cases into propositions, assumptions, and undisputed case information.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Hicks T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102199. PubMed ID: 31756630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.