167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32564107)
1. [Subtrochanteric femur fractures-epidemiology, surgical procedures, influence of time to surgery and comorbidities on complications : A risk-adjusted regression analysis of routine data from 2124 cases].
Müller-Mai CM; Deitert D; Hörter S; Schulze Raestrup US; Zwillich C; Smektala R
Chirurg; 2021 Mar; 92(3):248-263. PubMed ID: 32564107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a meta-analysis.
Liu P; Wu X; Shi H; Liu R; Shu H; Gong J; Yang Y; Sun Q; Wu J; Nie X; Cai M
Clin Interv Aging; 2015; 10():803-11. PubMed ID: 25960644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hip Fractures: Therapy, Timing, and Complication Spectrum.
Saul D; Riekenberg J; Ammon JC; Hoffmann DB; Sehmisch S
Orthop Surg; 2019 Dec; 11(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 31568676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Long-term anticoagulation treatment in proximal femoral fractures as obstacle to surgery in the 24h time window? : Results of an analysis of Quality Assurance data on 32,252 treatment courses with osteosynthesis].
Neumann CJ; Sandfort M; Smektala R
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb); 2024 Apr; 127(4):305-312. PubMed ID: 37880352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang J; Li H; Jia H; Ma X
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2020 Nov; 54(6):639-646. PubMed ID: 33423999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur. What's new?].
Bonnaire F; Straßberger C; Kieb M; Bula P
Chirurg; 2012 Oct; 83(10):882-91. PubMed ID: 23051986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trochanteric-entry long cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma.
Robinson CM; Houshian S; Khan LA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Oct; 87(10):2217-26. PubMed ID: 16203886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Treatment of Subtrochanteric Fractures, Our Experience, Complications].
Pavelka T; SalÁŠek M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(4):259-267. PubMed ID: 32940221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Total hip arthroplasty after failure of per- and subtrochanteric fracture fixation in elderly subjects].
Hernigou P; Poignard A; Mathieu G; Cohen G; Manicom O; Filippini P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2006 Jun; 92(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 16948457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
Krappinger D; Wolf B; Dammerer D; Thaler M; Schwendinger P; Lindtner RA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 Jun; 139(6):769-777. PubMed ID: 30729990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Complications of dynamic hip screw treatment for proximal femoral fractures].
Hrubina M; Skoták M; Běhounek J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Oct; 77(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 21040651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures using short proximal femoral nails].
Pavelka T; Kortus J; Linhart M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 12764949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [One-year outcomes for proximal femoral fractures: Posthospital analysis of mortality and care levels based on health insurance data].
Müller-Mai CM; Schulze Raestrup US; Kostuj T; Dahlhoff G; Günster C; Smektala R
Unfallchirurg; 2015 Sep; 118(9):780-94. PubMed ID: 24352202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison and analysis of reoperations in two different treatment protocols for trochanteric hip fractures - postoperative technical complications with dynamic hip screw, intramedullary nail and Medoff sliding plate.
Paulsson J; Stig JC; Olsson O
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):364. PubMed ID: 28836973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
