168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32565653)
21. Is urethral mobility really being assessed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system?
Cogan SL; Weber AM; Hammel JP
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 99(3):473-6. PubMed ID: 11864676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms.
Lakeman MM; Zijta FM; Peringa J; Nederveen AJ; Stoker J; Roovers JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1547-54. PubMed ID: 22531955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The usefulness of MR defecography in the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction: our experience using 3T MRI.
Al-Najar MS; Ghanem AF; AlRyalat SAS; Al-Ryalat NT; Alhajahjeh SO
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Sep; 42(9):2219-2224. PubMed ID: 28386692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective Comparison between two different magnetic resonance defecography techniques for evaluating pelvic floor disorders: air-balloon versus gel for rectal filling.
Maccioni F; Al Ansari N; Buonocore V; Mazzamurro F; Indinnimeo M; Mongardini M; Catalano C
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1783-91. PubMed ID: 26443600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Dynamic MR defecography for diagnosis of combined functional disorders of the pelvic floor in proctology].
Paetzel C; Strotzer M; Fürst A; Rentsch M; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S
Rofo; 2001 May; 173(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 11414148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Comparison with conventional X-ray defecography.
Poncelet E; Rock A; Quinton JF; Cosson M; Ramdane N; Nicolas L; Feldmann A; Salleron J
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Apr; 98(4):327-332. PubMed ID: 28089181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MR defecography review.
Kanmaniraja D; Arif-Tiwari H; Palmer SL; Kamath A; Lewis SC; Flusberg M; Kobi M; Lockhart ME; Chernyak V
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1334-1350. PubMed ID: 31544226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound and defecography for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders.
Beer-Gabel M; Carter D
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 30(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 25820786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography: a diagnostic alternative in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders in proctology.
Rentsch M; Paetzel C; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S; Jauch KW; Fürst A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jul; 44(7):999-1007. PubMed ID: 11496081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging.
Vanbeckevoort D; Van Hoe L; Oyen R; Ponette E; De Ridder D; Deprest J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Mar; 9(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 10194705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic anal endosonography and MRI defecography in diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: comparison with conventional defecography.
Vitton V; Vignally P; Barthet M; Cohen V; Durieux O; Bouvier M; Grimaud JC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Nov; 54(11):1398-404. PubMed ID: 21979185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Defecatory dysfunction and fecal incontinence in women with or without posterior vaginal wall prolapse as measured by pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q).
Augusto KL; Bezerra LRPS; Murad-Regadas SM; Vasconcelos Neto JA; Vasconcelos CTM; Karbage SAL; Bilhar APM; Regadas FSP
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jul; 214():50-55. PubMed ID: 28477524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cut-offs for defining uterine prolapse using transperineal ultrasound in Chinese women: prospective multicenter study.
Wu M; Wang X; Lin X; Fu Y; Chen H; Guan X; Huang W; Chen Y; Zhang L; Jing C; Wei J; Tian J; Zhang X
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 58(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 33094536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Protocol for translabial 3D-ultrasonography for diagnosing levator defects (TRUDIL): a multicentre cohort study for estimating the diagnostic accuracy of translabial 3D-ultrasonography of the pelvic floor as compared to MR imaging.
Notten KJ; Weemhoff M; Kluivers KB; Schweitzer KJ; Mulder F; Stoker J; Beets-Tan RG; Futterer JJ; Vliegen RF; Evers JL; Link G; Bergmans MG; Kampschöer PH; Gondrie ET; van Gestel I; van Dooren I; Dirksen C; Smits LJ; Bossuyt PM; Roovers JP
BMC Womens Health; 2011 Jun; 11():23. PubMed ID: 21639876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Anterior enterocele as an etiology for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a magnetic resonance defecography case series.
Aziz M; Khatri G; Hess D; Zimmern P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1390-1394. PubMed ID: 31728611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnosis of cystocele type by clinical examination and pelvic floor ultrasound.
Chantarasorn V; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):710-4. PubMed ID: 22125257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound?
Shek KL; Dietz HP
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1783-7. PubMed ID: 26174659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Vaginal descent and pelvic floor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a longitudinal study.
Bradley CS; Zimmerman MB; Wang Q; Nygaard IE;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 111(5):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18448748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support.
Berger MB; Kolenic GE; Fenner DE; Morgan DM; DeLancey JOL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):510.e1-510.e8. PubMed ID: 29409787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of tridimensional dynamic ultrasound for pelvic floor evaluation.
de la Portilla F; Rubio Manzanares Dorado M; Pino Díaz V; Vazquez Monchul JM; Palacios C; Díaz Pavón JM; Sánchez Gil JM; García Cabrera AM
Cir Esp; 2015 Oct; 93(8):530-5. PubMed ID: 25659535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
