125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3256647)
1. Prophylactic cytological investigation for cervical cancer in relation to stage at diagnosis: a study of 420 women in Denmark.
Olesen F
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Aug; 38(313):356-9. PubMed ID: 3256647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Papanicolaou smear history of patients developing cervical cancer: an assessment of screening protocols.
Bearman DM; MacMillan JP; Creasman WT
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 69(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 3808501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal frequency of screening for cervical cancer: a Toronto case-control study.
Clarke EA; Hilditch S; Anderson TW
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):125-31. PubMed ID: 3570399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
Lynge E; Poll P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cytological history of cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in France in 2006].
Boulanger JC; Fauvet R; Urrutiaguer S; Drean Y; Sevestre H; Ganry O; Bergeron C; Gondry J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):764-71. PubMed ID: 17765001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Screening profile of women who have died from cervical cancer].
Ejersbo D
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 18307959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendations for cervical screening 1997. Members of the Working Party on Cervical Screening.
N Z Med J; 1998 Mar; 111(1062):94-8. PubMed ID: 9577460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cytological history of 101 patients with invasive cancer of the uterine cervix].
Vincenzoni C; Mariani L; Vocaturo G; Lombardi A; Iacovelli A
Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Jun; 43(6):273-7. PubMed ID: 1922899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytological screening history of patients with early invasive cervical cancer.
Turner MJ; Keane DP; Flannelly GM; Lenehan PM; Murphy JF; Foley ME
Ir Med J; 1990 Jun; 83(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 2202697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
Hølund B; Grinsted P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Case-control study of the effectiveness of mass screening in reducing invasive cervical cancer].
Makino H; Sato S; Yajima A; Fukao A
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Sep; 43(9):1226-32. PubMed ID: 1919184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Characterization of "non-attenders" in an organized screening against cancer of cervix uteri].
Larsen LP; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May; 158(21):2987-91. PubMed ID: 8686037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changes in awareness of cervical cancer patients after medical treatments and the correlation of cervical screening situation and clinical stage at consultation].
Wang CF; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 47(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 22883525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
