353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32566589)
1. Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study.
Lu C; Lu T; Ge L; Yang N; Yan P; Yang K
Ann Transl Med; 2020 May; 8(10):652. PubMed ID: 32566589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28335734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronavirus disease (COVID 2019): protocol for a living overview of systematic reviews.
Lu C; Lu T; Pan B; Wang Q; Hou L; Zhang Q; Wang Y; Wang Y; Li X; Ruan Y; Chen L; Lai H; Qin T; Ge L; Yan K
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Feb; 10(2):1488-1493. PubMed ID: 33353349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Appraisal methods and outcomes of AMSTAR 2 assessments in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions in the cardiovascular field: A methodological study.
Karakasis P; Bougioukas KI; Pamporis K; Fragakis N; Haidich AB
Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 37956538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological assessment and overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews with meta-analyses focusing on traumatic dental injuries: A cross-sectional study.
Nagendrababu V; Faggion CM; Gopinath VK; Narasimhan S; Duncan HF; Levin L; Abbott PV; Dummer PMH
Dent Traumatol; 2023 Dec; 39(6):637-646. PubMed ID: 37594908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.
Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR.
Yuan M; Wu J; Austin RE; Lista F; Ahmad J
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2021 Sep; 3(3):ojab020. PubMed ID: 34240051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Most systematic reviews reporting adherence to AMSTAR 2 had critically low methodological quality: a cross-sectional meta-research study.
Bojcic R; Todoric M; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 165():111210. PubMed ID: 37931822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality Assessment of Systematic Review of the Bariatric Surgery for Diabetes Mellitus.
Jin X; Wang J; Li X; An P; Wang H; Mao W; Zhou Q; Chen Y; Wang J; Chen K; Mu Y
J Diabetes Res; 2019; 2019():9541638. PubMed ID: 31871951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Liu A; Yu W; Chen J; Guo T; Niu P; Feng H; Jia Y
Stem Cells Dev; 2022 Aug; 31(15-16):431-444. PubMed ID: 35316077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality.
Sharma S; Oremus M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
