These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32567126)

  • 1. Accuracy of Implant Analogs in 3D Printed Resin Models.
    Maria R; Tan MY; Wong KM; Lee BCH; Chia VAP; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Jan; 30(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 32567126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 3D positional accuracy of implant analogs in printed resin models versus conventional stone casts: Effect of implant angulation.
    Tan S; Tan MY; Wong KM; Maria R; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; 33(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 36639956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.
    Revilla-León M; Gonzalez-Martín Ó; Pérez López J; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Özcan M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):560-567. PubMed ID: 29148121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of 3D printed models and implant-analog positions according to the implant-analog-holder offset, inner structure, and printing layer thickness: an in-vitro study.
    Jin G; Shin SH; Shim JS; Lee KW; Kim JE
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104268. PubMed ID: 35995083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of scan body design and digital implant analogs on implant replica position in additively manufactured casts.
    Revilla-León M; Fogarty R; Barrington JJ; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 31787272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques.
    Alsharbaty MHM; Alikhasi M; Zarrati S; Shamshiri AR
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):e902-e908. PubMed ID: 29423969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional accuracy of a digitally coded healing abutment implant impression system.
    Ng SD; Tan KB; Teoh KH; Cheng AC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 25032774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
    Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts.
    Jang Y; Sim JY; Park JK; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 31027960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques.
    Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Mancl L; Brudvik JS; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 24079558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of 3D Printing Orientation on the Accuracy of Implant Surgical Templates Fabricated By Desktop Printer.
    Tahir N; Abduo J
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):791-798. PubMed ID: 35067993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of the Implant Replica Positions on the Complete Edentulous Additive Manufactured Cast.
    Olea-Vielba M; Jareño-García D; Methani MM; Martinez-Klemm I; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 32337776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional positional accuracy of intraoral and laboratory implant scan bodies.
    Tan JZH; Tan MY; See Toh YL; Wong KY; Tan KBC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):735-744. PubMed ID: 33836856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional accuracy of plastic transfer impression copings for three implant systems.
    Teo JW; Tan KB; Nicholls JI; Wong KM; Uy J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 24818195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.