125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32567133)
21. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 3D tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound using deep convolutional neural network.
Li Y; Wu W; Chen H; Cheng L; Wang S
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5669-5680. PubMed ID: 32970838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer-aided detection system for masses in automated whole breast ultrasonography: development and evaluation of the effectiveness.
Kim JH; Cha JH; Kim N; Chang Y; Ko MS; Choi YW; Kim HH
Ultrasonography; 2014 Apr; 33(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24936503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Whole-Breast Ultrasound for Breast Screening and Archiving.
Huang CS; Yang YW; Chen RT; Lo CM; Lo C; Cheng CF; Lee CS; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):926-933. PubMed ID: 28283326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-aided detection of cancer in automated 3-D breast ultrasound.
Tan T; Platel B; Mus R; Tabar L; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1698-706. PubMed ID: 23693128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improved mass detection in 3D automated breast ultrasound using region based features and multi-view information.
Ye C; Vaidya V; Zhao F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2865-8. PubMed ID: 25570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rapid image stitching and computer-aided detection for multipass automated breast ultrasound.
Chang RF; Chang-Chien KC; Takada E; Huang CS; Chou YH; Kuo CM; Chen JH
Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2063-73. PubMed ID: 20527539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mass Segmentation in Automated 3-D Breast Ultrasound Using Adaptive Region Growing and Supervised Edge-Based Deformable Model.
Kozegar E; Soryani M; Behnam H; Salamati M; Tan T
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Apr; 37(4):918-928. PubMed ID: 29610071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-aided classification of breast masses using speckle features of automated breast ultrasound images.
Moon WK; Lo CM; Chang JM; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang RF
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6465-73. PubMed ID: 23039681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast tumor segmentation in 3D automatic breast ultrasound using Mask scoring R-CNN.
Lei Y; He X; Yao J; Wang T; Wang L; Li W; Curran WJ; Liu T; Xu D; Yang X
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):204-214. PubMed ID: 33128230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reducing false positives of microcalcification detection systems by removal of breast arterial calcifications.
Mordang JJ; Gubern-Mérida A; den Heeten G; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1676. PubMed ID: 27036566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dilated densely connected U-Net with uncertainty focus loss for 3D ABUS mass segmentation.
Cao X; Chen H; Li Y; Peng Y; Wang S; Cheng L
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 209():106313. PubMed ID: 34364182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data.
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21498319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
