These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Ahmed to Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device exchange in pediatric patients. Jacobson A; Bohnsack BL BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):310. PubMed ID: 37434139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glaucoma drainage implants in the treatment of refractory glaucoma in pediatric patients. Autrata R; Helmanova I; Oslejskova H; Vondracek P; Rehurek J Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(6):928-37. PubMed ID: 18050119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grooved Glaucoma Drainage Devices That Continuously Deliver Cyclosporine A Decrease Postsurgical Scar Formation in Rabbit Eyes. Dai Z; Yu X; Sun J; Sun X Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Mar; 58(3):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 28319643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Drainage implants in surgical management of pediatric glaucoma]. Krejcírová I; Autrata R; Rehůrek J Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 May; 65(3):79-86. PubMed ID: 19642353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Glaucoma Drainage Device Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Secondary Glaucoma Following Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation. Denny MR; Chu FB; Cheung AY; Holland EJ J Glaucoma; 2021 Mar; 30(3):e119-e122. PubMed ID: 33137017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concurrent adjacent strabismus surgery with glaucoma drainage device placement in childhood glaucomas. Jacobson A; Bohnsack BL BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):4. PubMed ID: 38172748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Baerveldt glaucoma implant in the management of refractory childhood glaucomas. Budenz DL; Gedde SJ; Brandt JD; Kira D; Feuer W; Larson E Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2204-10. PubMed ID: 15582075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Surgical and Clinical Success Rates of Ahmed FP7, and Baerveldt 250 and Baerveldt 350 Glaucoma Drainage Devices. Kilgore KP; Grosinger AJ; Liu LY; Jamali S; Arora N; White LJ; Khanna CL J Glaucoma; 2023 Mar; 32(3):210-220. PubMed ID: 36223294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical outcomes of a new affordable non-valved glaucoma drainage device and Ahmed glaucoma valve: comparison in the first year. Pathak Ray V; Rao DP Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 29945893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of Ahmed and Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device implantation in the pediatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stallworth JY; O'Brien KS; Han Y; Oatts JT Surv Ophthalmol; 2023; 68(4):578-590. PubMed ID: 36740196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 glaucoma valve compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 glaucoma implant. Goulet RJ; Phan AD; Cantor LB; WuDunn D Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18164068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound evaluation of glaucoma drainage devices in children. Baig NB; Lin AA; Freedman SF J AAPOS; 2015 Jun; 19(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 25907830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glaucoma drainage devices: a review of the past, present, and future. Patel S; Pasquale LR Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):265-70. PubMed ID: 21091010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New glaucoma drainage implants available to glaucoma surgeons. Khodeiry M; Sayed MS Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 34(2):176-180. PubMed ID: 36718677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bleb morphology of glaucoma drainage devices on magnetic resonance imaging. Correia Barão R; Berhanu D; Bernardo Matos D; Barata AD; Sousa R; Abegão Pinto L Acta Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 101(7):789-796. PubMed ID: 37066864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]