These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32567448)

  • 1. Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Devices in Childhood Glaucoma.
    Elhusseiny AM; VanderVeen DK
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 35(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 32567448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valved Glaucoma Drainage Devices in Pediatric Glaucoma: Retrospective Long-term Outcomes.
    Chen A; Yu F; Law SK; Giaconi JA; Coleman AL; Caprioli J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 133(9):1030-5. PubMed ID: 26087019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ahmed to Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device exchange in pediatric patients.
    Jacobson A; Bohnsack BL
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):310. PubMed ID: 37434139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glaucoma drainage implants in the treatment of refractory glaucoma in pediatric patients.
    Autrata R; Helmanova I; Oslejskova H; Vondracek P; Rehurek J
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(6):928-37. PubMed ID: 18050119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grooved Glaucoma Drainage Devices That Continuously Deliver Cyclosporine A Decrease Postsurgical Scar Formation in Rabbit Eyes.
    Dai Z; Yu X; Sun J; Sun X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Mar; 58(3):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 28319643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Drainage implants in surgical management of pediatric glaucoma].
    Krejcírová I; Autrata R; Rehůrek J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 May; 65(3):79-86. PubMed ID: 19642353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Glaucoma Drainage Device Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Secondary Glaucoma Following Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation.
    Denny MR; Chu FB; Cheung AY; Holland EJ
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Mar; 30(3):e119-e122. PubMed ID: 33137017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent adjacent strabismus surgery with glaucoma drainage device placement in childhood glaucomas.
    Jacobson A; Bohnsack BL
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):4. PubMed ID: 38172748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baerveldt glaucoma implant in the management of refractory childhood glaucomas.
    Budenz DL; Gedde SJ; Brandt JD; Kira D; Feuer W; Larson E
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2204-10. PubMed ID: 15582075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ab interno tube ligation for refractory hypotony following non-valved glaucoma drainage device implantation.
    Vergados A; Mohite AA; Sung VCT
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 257(10):2271-2278. PubMed ID: 31332510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Surgical and Clinical Success Rates of Ahmed FP7, and Baerveldt 250 and Baerveldt 350 Glaucoma Drainage Devices.
    Kilgore KP; Grosinger AJ; Liu LY; Jamali S; Arora N; White LJ; Khanna CL
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Mar; 32(3):210-220. PubMed ID: 36223294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical outcomes of a new affordable non-valved glaucoma drainage device and Ahmed glaucoma valve: comparison in the first year.
    Pathak Ray V; Rao DP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 29945893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of Ahmed and Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device implantation in the pediatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Stallworth JY; O'Brien KS; Han Y; Oatts JT
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2023; 68(4):578-590. PubMed ID: 36740196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 glaucoma valve compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 glaucoma implant.
    Goulet RJ; Phan AD; Cantor LB; WuDunn D
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18164068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound evaluation of glaucoma drainage devices in children.
    Baig NB; Lin AA; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2015 Jun; 19(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 25907830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glaucoma drainage devices: a review of the past, present, and future.
    Patel S; Pasquale LR
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):265-70. PubMed ID: 21091010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New glaucoma drainage implants available to glaucoma surgeons.
    Khodeiry M; Sayed MS
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 34(2):176-180. PubMed ID: 36718677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bleb morphology of glaucoma drainage devices on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Correia Barão R; Berhanu D; Bernardo Matos D; Barata AD; Sousa R; Abegão Pinto L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 101(7):789-796. PubMed ID: 37066864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI): Review of Indications, Mechanism, Surgical Technique, Outcomes, Impact and Limitations.
    Sisodia VPS; Krishnamurthy R
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2022; 37(7-8):856-868. PubMed ID: 35656796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of inferonasal glaucoma drainage device surgery in the management of childhood glaucoma.
    Al-Lozi A; Umfress AC; Stinnett SS; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2022 Oct; 26(5):232.e1-232.e7. PubMed ID: 36122872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.